Literature DB >> 11916676

Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids.

K C Thomas1, S H Hynes, W M Ingledew.   

Abstract

Acetic acid (167 mM) and lactic acid (548 mM) completely inhibited growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae both in minimal medium and in media which contained supplements, such as yeast extract, corn steep powder, or a mixture of amino acids. However, the yeast grew when the pH of the medium containing acetic acid or lactic acid was adjusted to 4.5, even though the medium still contained the undissociated form of either acid at a concentration of 102 mM. The results indicated that the buffer pair formed when the pH was adjusted to 4.5 stabilized the pH of the medium by sequestering protons and by lessening the negative impact of the pH drop on yeast growth, and it also decreased the difference between the extracellular and intracellular pH values (Delta(pH)), the driving force for the intracellular accumulation of acid. Increasing the undissociated acetic acid concentration at pH 4.5 to 163 mM by raising the concentration of the total acid to 267 mM did not increase inhibition. It is suggested that this may be the direct result of decreased acidification of the cytosol because of the intracellular buffering by the buffer pair formed from the acid already accumulated. At a concentration of 102 mM undissociated acetic acid, the yeast grew to higher cell density at pH 3.0 than at pH 4.5, suggesting that it is the total concentration of acetic acid (104 mM at pH 3.0 and 167 mM at pH 4.5) that determines the extent of growth inhibition, not the concentration of undissociated acid alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11916676      PMCID: PMC123831          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1616-1623.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M E Pampulha; M C Loureiro-Dias
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Transport of acetate in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective in monocarboxylate permeases.

Authors:  S Paiva; S Althoff; M Casal; C Leão
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Effects of ethanol and other alkanols on transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Casal; H Cardoso; C Leão
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Intracellular pH changes during the cell cycle in Tetrahymena.

Authors:  R J Gillies; D W Deamer
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  Mechanisms regulating the transport of acetic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Margarida Casal; Helena Cardoso; Cecilia Leao
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.777

6.  Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Effects of pH and acetic acid on glucose and xylose metabolism by a genetically engineered ethanologenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H G Lawford; J D Rousseau
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.926

8.  Measurement of yeast intracellular pH by image processing and the change it undergoes during growth phase.

Authors:  T Imai; T Ohno
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1995-01-15       Impact factor: 3.307

9.  Effects of particulate materials and osmoprotectants on very-high-gravity ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K C Thomas; S H Hynes; W M Ingledew
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The relationship between viability and intracellular pH in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Imai; T Ohno
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  37 in total

1.  Repeated cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae SC90 to tolerate inhibitors generated during cassava processing waste hydrolysis for bioethanol production.

Authors:  Pakathamon Palakawong Na Ayutthaya; Theppanya Charoenrat; Warawut Krusong; Soisuda Pornpukdeewattana
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Acetate but not propionate induces oxidative stress in bakers' yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Halyna M Semchyshyn; Oleksandra B Abrat; Jacek Miedzobrodzki; Yoshiharu Inoue; Volodymyr I Lushchak
Journal:  Redox Rep       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.412

3.  Evaluation of fermentation kinetics of acid-treated corn cob hydrolysate for xylose fermentation in the presence of acetic acid by Pichia stipitis.

Authors:  Mohan Kashid; Anand Ghosalkar
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production.

Authors:  Kelly A Skinner; Timothy D Leathers
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-08-28       Impact factor: 3.346

5.  Inhibition of yeast by lactic acid bacteria in continuous culture: nutrient depletion and/or acid toxicity?

Authors:  Dennis P Bayrock; W Michael Ingledew
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  The potential of the newly isolated thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus for high-temperature ethanol production using sweet sorghum juice.

Authors:  Warayutt Pilap; Sudarat Thanonkeo; Preekamol Klanrit; Pornthap Thanonkeo
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Identification of oleaginous yeast strains able to accumulate high intracellular lipids when cultivated in alkaline pretreated corn stover.

Authors:  Irnayuli R Sitepu; Mingjie Jin; J Enrique Fernandez; Leonardo da Costa Sousa; Venkatesh Balan; Kyria L Boundy-Mills
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Effect of pH and lactic or acetic acid on ethanol productivity by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in corn mash.

Authors:  Tara Graves; Neelakantam V Narendranath; Karl Dawson; Ronan Power
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Application of acetate buffer in pH adjustment of sorghum mash and its influence on fuel ethanol fermentation.

Authors:  Renyong Zhao; Scott R Bean; Beth Ann Crozier-Dodson; Daniel Y C Fung; Donghai Wang
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  Batch and fed-batch production of probiotic biomass and nisin in nutrient-supplemented whey media.

Authors:  Mónica Costas Malvido; Elisa Alonso González; Delicia L Bazán Tantaleán; Ricardo J Bendaña Jácome; Nelson Pérez Guerra
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.