Literature DB >> 15254237

BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function.

Martin F Arlt1, Bo Xu, Sandra G Durkin, Anne M Casper, Michael B Kastan, Thomas W Glover.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites are loci that form chromosome gaps or breaks when DNA synthesis is partially inhibited. Fragile sites are prone to deletions, translocations, and other rearrangements that can cause the inactivation of associated tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells. It was previously shown that ATR is critical to fragile-site stability and that ATR-deficient cells have greatly elevated fragile-site expression (A. M. Casper, P. Nghiem, M. F. Arlt, and T. W. Glover, Cell 111:779-789, 2002). Here we demonstrate that mouse and human cells deficient for BRCA1, due to mutation or knockdown by RNA interference, also have elevated fragile-site expression. We further show that BRCA1 functions in the induction of the G(2)/M checkpoint after aphidicolin-induced replication stalling and that this checkpoint function is involved in fragile-site stability. These data indicate that BRCA1 is important in fragile-site stability and that fragile sites are recognized by the G(2)/M checkpoint pathway, in which BRCA1 plays a key role. Furthermore, they suggest that mutations in BRCA1 or interacting proteins could lead to rearrangements at fragile sites in cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15254237      PMCID: PMC444841          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.15.6701-6709.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  48 in total

1.  Preferential integration of marker DNA into the chromosomal fragile site at 3p14: an approach to cloning fragile sites.

Authors:  F V Rassool; T W McKeithan; M E Neilly; E van Melle; R Espinosa; M M Le Beau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  FRA3B extends over a broad region and contains a spontaneous HPV16 integration site: direct evidence for the coincidence of viral integration sites and fragile sites.

Authors:  C M Wilke; B K Hall; A Hoge; W Paradee; D I Smith; T W Glover
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons.

Authors:  A Coquelle; E Pipiras; F Toledo; G Buttin; M Debatisse
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Location of BRCA1 in human breast and ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  R Scully; S Ganesan; M Brown; J A De Caprio; S A Cannistra; J Feunteun; S Schnitt; D M Livingston
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The FHIT gene at 3p14.2 is abnormal in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M Negrini; C Monaco; I Vorechovsky; M Ohta; T Druck; R Baffa; K Huebner; C M Croce
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Deficient nonhomologous end-joining activity in cell-free extracts from Brca1-null fibroblasts.

Authors:  Qing Zhong; Thomas G Boyer; Phang-Lang Chen; Wen-Hwa Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges at common fragile sites.

Authors:  T W Glover; C K Stein
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Fragile site orthologs FHIT/FRA3B and Fhit/Fra14A2: evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic.

Authors:  Ayumi Matsuyama; Takeshi Shiraishi; Francesco Trapasso; Tamotsu Kuroki; Hansjuerg Alder; Masaki Mori; Kay Huebner; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The FHIT gene, spanning the chromosome 3p14.2 fragile site and renal carcinoma-associated t(3;8) breakpoint, is abnormal in digestive tract cancers.

Authors:  M Ohta; H Inoue; M G Cotticelli; K Kastury; R Baffa; J Palazzo; Z Siprashvili; M Mori; P McCue; T Druck; C M Croce; K Huebner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Translocation t(3;8)(p14.2;q24.1) in renal cell carcinoma affects expression of the common fragile site at 3p14(FRA3B) in lymphocytes.

Authors:  T W Glover; J F Coyle-Morris; F P Li; R S Brown; C S Berger; R M Gemmill; F Hecht
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1988-03
View more
  58 in total

1.  Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability.

Authors:  Michal Schwartz; Eitan Zlotorynski; Michal Goldberg; Efrat Ozeri; Ayelet Rahat; Carlos le Sage; Benjamin P C Chen; David J Chen; Reuven Agami; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.

Authors:  Eliane El Achkar; Michelle Gerbault-Seureau; Martine Muleris; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.

Authors:  Anthony Admire; Lisa Shanks; Nicole Danzl; Mei Wang; Ulli Weier; William Stevens; Elizabeth Hunt; Ted Weinert
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Increased common fragile site expression, cell proliferation defects, and apoptosis following conditional inactivation of mouse Hus1 in primary cultured cells.

Authors:  Min Zhu; Robert S Weiss
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  A deletion at the mouse Xist gene exposes trans-effects that alter the heterochromatin of the inactive X chromosome and the replication time and DNA stability of both X chromosomes.

Authors:  Silvia V Diaz-Perez; David O Ferguson; Chen Wang; Gyorgyi Csankovszki; Chengming Wang; Shih-Chang Tsai; Devkanya Dutta; Vanessa Perez; SunMin Kim; C Daniel Eller; Jennifer Salstrom; Yan Ouyang; Michael A Teitell; Bernhard Kaltenboeck; Andrew Chess; Sui Huang; York Marahrens
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  The SNM1B/APOLLO DNA nuclease functions in resolution of replication stress and maintenance of common fragile site stability.

Authors:  Jennifer M Mason; Ishita Das; Martin Arlt; Neil Patel; Stephanie Kraftson; Thomas W Glover; JoAnn M Sekiguchi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 9.  The biological effects of simple tandem repeats: lessons from the repeat expansion diseases.

Authors:  Karen Usdin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Chromosome breakages associated with 45S ribosomal DNA sequences in spotted snakehead fish Channa punctatus.

Authors:  Mamta Singh; Anindya Sundar Barman
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.