Literature DB >> 23863462

The SNM1B/APOLLO DNA nuclease functions in resolution of replication stress and maintenance of common fragile site stability.

Jennifer M Mason1, Ishita Das, Martin Arlt, Neil Patel, Stephanie Kraftson, Thomas W Glover, JoAnn M Sekiguchi.   

Abstract

SNM1B/Apollo is a DNA nuclease that has important functions in telomere maintenance and repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) within the Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway. SNM1B is required for efficient localization of key repair proteins, such as the FA protein, FANCD2, to sites of ICL damage and functions epistatically to FANCD2 in cellular survival to ICLs and homology-directed repair. The FA pathway is also activated in response to replication fork stalling. Here, we sought to determine the importance of SNM1B in cellular responses to stalled forks in the absence of a blocking lesion, such as ICLs. We found that depletion of SNM1B results in hypersensitivity to aphidicolin, a DNA polymerase inhibitor that causes replication stress. We observed that the SNM1B nuclease is required for efficient localization of the DNA repair proteins, FANCD2 and BRCA1, to subnuclear foci upon aphidicolin treatment, thereby indicating SNM1B facilitates direct repair of stalled forks. Consistent with a role for SNM1B subsequent to recognition of the lesion, we found that SNM1B is dispensable for upstream events, including activation of ATR-dependent signaling and localization of RPA, γH2AX and the MRE11/RAD50/NBS1 complex to aphidicolin-induced foci. We determined that a major consequence of SNM1B depletion is a marked increase in spontaneous and aphidicolin-induced chromosomal gaps and breaks, including breakage at common fragile sites. Thus, this study provides evidence that SNM1B functions in resolving replication stress and preventing accumulation of genomic damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23863462      PMCID: PMC3836474          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddt340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  59 in total

1.  The Apollo 5' exonuclease functions together with TRF2 to protect telomeres from DNA repair.

Authors:  Christelle Lenain; Serge Bauwens; Simon Amiard; Michele Brunori; Marie-Josèphe Giraud-Panis; Eric Gilson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Bloom's syndrome helicase and Mus81 are required to induce transient double-strand DNA breaks in response to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Tsutomu Shimura; Michael J Torres; Melvenia M Martin; V Ashutosh Rao; Yves Pommier; Mari Katsura; Kiyoshi Miyagawa; Mirit I Aladjem
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  To the rescue: the Fanconi anemia genome stability pathway salvages replication forks.

Authors:  George-Lucian Moldovan; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 4.  Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability.

Authors:  Alessia Errico; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 8.250

5.  Coordination of structure-specific nucleases by human SLX4/BTBD12 is required for DNA repair.

Authors:  Ivan M Muñoz; Karolina Hain; Anne-Cécile Déclais; Mary Gardiner; Geraldine W Toh; Luis Sanchez-Pulido; Johannes M Heuckmann; Rachel Toth; Thomas Macartney; Berina Eppink; Roland Kanaar; Chris P Ponting; David M J Lilley; John Rouse
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Bo Xu; Sandra G Durkin; Anne M Casper; Michael B Kastan; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

8.  Mus81-mediated DNA cleavage resolves replication forks stalled by topoisomerase I-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Marie Regairaz; Yong-Wei Zhang; Haiqing Fu; Keli K Agama; Nalini Tata; Surbhi Agrawal; Mirit I Aladjem; Yves Pommier
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  RAD51- and MRE11-dependent reassembly of uncoupled CMG helicase complex at collapsed replication forks.

Authors:  Yoshitami Hashimoto; Fabio Puddu; Vincenzo Costanzo
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Identification of the FANCI protein, a monoubiquitinated FANCD2 paralog required for DNA repair.

Authors:  Agata Smogorzewska; Shuhei Matsuoka; Patrizia Vinciguerra; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Bryan A Ballif; Steven P Gygi; Kay Hofmann; Alan D D'Andrea; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Heterochromatin replication goes hand in hand with telomere protection.

Authors:  Aaron Mendez-Bermudez; Marie-Josèphe Giraud-Panis; Jing Ye; Eric Gilson
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Identifying Putative Susceptibility Genes and Evaluating Their Associations with Somatic Mutations in Human Cancers.

Authors:  Zhishan Chen; Wanqing Wen; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Xiao-Ou Shu; Virginia Díez-Obrero; Jirong Long; Jiandong Bao; Jing Wang; Qi Liu; Qiuyin Cai; Victor Moreno; Wei Zheng; Xingyi Guo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Fragile sites in cancer: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Thomas W Glover; Thomas E Wilson; Martin F Arlt
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  DNA secondary structure at chromosomal fragile sites in human disease.

Authors:  Ryan G Thys; Christine E Lehman; Levi C T Pierce; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 5.  Are common fragile sites merely structural domains or highly organized "functional" units susceptible to oncogenic stress?

Authors:  Alexandros G Georgakilas; Petros Tsantoulis; Athanassios Kotsinas; Ioannis Michalopoulos; Paul Townsend; Vassilis G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  DNA Replication Origins and Fork Progression at Mammalian Telomeres.

Authors:  Mitsunori Higa; Masatoshi Fujita; Kazumasa Yoshida
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 7.  Updating the mechanisms of common fragile site instability: how to reconcile the different views?

Authors:  Benoît Le Tallec; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Therese Wilhelm; Anne Letessier; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  SNM1B/Apollo in the DNA damage response and telomere maintenance.

Authors:  Maren Schmiester; Ilja Demuth
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-18

9.  Inflammatory related gene IKKα, IKKβ, IKKγ cooperates to determine liver cancer stem cells progression by altering telomere via heterochromatin protein 1-HOTAIR axis.

Authors:  Jiahui An; Mengying Wu; Xiaoru Xin; Zhuojia Lin; Xiaonan Li; Qidi Zheng; Xin Gui; Tianming Li; Hu Pu; Haiyan Li; Dongdong Lu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-02

10.  Topoisomerase II contributes to DNA secondary structure-mediated double-stranded breaks.

Authors:  Karol Szlachta; Arkadi Manukyan; Heather M Raimer; Sandeep Singh; Anita Salamon; Wenying Guo; Kirill S Lobachev; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 19.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.