Literature DB >> 16954539

Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Anne Helmrich1, Karen Stout-Weider, Klaus Hermann, Evelin Schrock, Thomas Heiden.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are seen as chromosomal gaps and breaks brought about by inhibition of replication, and it is thought that they cluster with tumor breakpoints. This study presents a comprehensive analysis using conventional and molecular cytogenetic mapping of CFSs and their expression frequencies in two mouse strains, BALB/c and C57BL/6, and in human probands. Here we show that induced mouse CFSs relate to sites of spontaneous gaps and breaks and that CFS expression levels in chromosome bands are conserved between the two mouse strains and between syntenic mouse and human DNA segments. Furthermore, four additional mouse CFSs were found to be homologous to human CFSs on the molecular cytogenetic level (Fra2D-FRA2G, Fra4C2-FRA9E, Fra6A3.1-FRA7G, and Fra6B1-FRA7H), increasing the number of such CFSs already described in the literature to eight. Contrary to previous reports, DNA helix flexibility is not increased in the 15 human and eight mouse CFSs molecularly defined so far, compared to large nonfragile control regions. Our findings suggest that the mechanisms that provoke instability at CFSs are evolutionarily conserved. The role that large transcriptionally active genes may play in CFS expression is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16954539      PMCID: PMC1581431          DOI: 10.1101/gr.5335506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  41 in total

1.  The role of late/slow replication of the FRA16D in common fragile site induction.

Authors:  Aparna Palakodeti; Yu Han; Yanwen Jiang; Michelle M Le Beau
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Molecular basis for expression of common and rare fragile sites.

Authors:  Eitan Zlotorynski; Ayelet Rahat; Jennifer Skaug; Neta Ben-Porat; Efrat Ozeri; Ruth Hershberg; Ayala Levi; Stephen W Scherer; Hanah Margalit; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Common fragile sites.

Authors:  M F Arlt; A M Casper; T W Glover
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  ATR regulates fragile site stability.

Authors:  Anne M Casper; Paul Nghiem; Martin F Arlt; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-12-13       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Characterization of the human common fragile site FRA2G.

Authors:  M Z Limongi; F Pelliccia; A Rocchi
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Identification of the human/mouse syntenic common fragile site FRA7K/Fra12C1--relation of FRA7K and other human common fragile sites on chromosome 7 to evolutionary breakpoints.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Anja Matthaei; Klaus Hermann; Thomas Heiden; Evelin Schrock
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Characterization of FRA6E and its potential role in autosomal recessive juvenile parkinsonism and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Stacy R Denison; Gwen Callahan; Nicole A Becker; Leslie A Phillips; David I Smith
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Characterization of the common fragile site FRA9E and its potential role in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Gwen Callahan; Stacy R Denison; Leslie A Phillips; Viji Shridhar; David I Smith
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Fragile site orthologs FHIT/FRA3B and Fhit/Fra14A2: evolutionarily conserved but highly recombinogenic.

Authors:  Ayumi Matsuyama; Takeshi Shiraishi; Francesco Trapasso; Tamotsu Kuroki; Hansjuerg Alder; Masaki Mori; Kay Huebner; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genome-wide DNA replication profile for Drosophila melanogaster: a link between transcription and replication timing.

Authors:  Dirk Schübeler; David Scalzo; Charles Kooperberg; Bas van Steensel; Jeffrey Delrow; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-09-30       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  50 in total

1.  Molecular profiling of common fragile sites in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Benoî Le Tallec; Bernard Dutrillaux; Anne-Marie Lachages; Gael Armel Millot; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Topoisomerase I suppresses genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription.

Authors:  Sandie Tuduri; Laure Crabbé; Chiara Conti; Hélène Tourrière; Heidi Holtgreve-Grez; Anna Jauch; Véronique Pantesco; John De Vos; Aubin Thomas; Charles Theillet; Yves Pommier; Jamal Tazi; Arnaud Coquelle; Philippe Pasero
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  Genomic instability in induced stem cells.

Authors:  C E Pasi; A Dereli-Öz; S Negrini; M Friedli; G Fragola; A Lombardo; G Van Houwe; L Naldini; S Casola; G Testa; D Trono; P G Pelicci; T D Halazonetis
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 4.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Transcription-replication encounters, consequences and genomic instability.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Evgeny Nudler; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  A P53-Independent DNA Damage Response Suppresses Oncogenic Proliferation and Genome Instability.

Authors:  Katerina D Fagan-Solis; Dennis A Simpson; Rashmi J Kumar; Luciano G Martelotto; Lisle E Mose; Naim U Rashid; Alice Y Ho; Simon N Powell; Y Hannah Wen; Joel S Parker; Jorge S Reis-Filho; John H J Petrini; Gaorav P Gupta
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Replication stress induces tumor-like microdeletions in FHIT/FRA3B.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Ryan L Ragland; Martin F Arlt; Jennifer G Mulle; Stephen T Warren; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Barlow; Robert B Faryabi; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Amy Malhowski; Hua Tang Chen; Gustavo Gutierrez-Cruz; Hong-Wei Sun; Peter McKinnon; George Wright; Rafael Casellas; Davide F Robbiani; Louis Staudt; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Claus Kemkemer; Matthias Kohn; David N Cooper; Lutz Froenicke; Josef Högel; Horst Hameister; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Mild folate deficiency induces genetic and epigenetic instability and phenotype changes in prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Gaia Bistulfi; Erika Vandette; Sei-Ichi Matsui; Dominic J Smiraglia
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 7.431

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.