Literature DB >> 16291645

Homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining repair pathways regulate fragile site stability.

Michal Schwartz1, Eitan Zlotorynski, Michal Goldberg, Efrat Ozeri, Ayelet Rahat, Carlos le Sage, Benjamin P C Chen, David J Chen, Reuven Agami, Batsheva Kerem.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites are specific loci that form gaps and constrictions on metaphase chromosomes exposed to replication stress, which slows DNA replication. These sites have a role in chromosomal rearrangements in tumors; however, the molecular mechanism of their expression is unclear. Here we show that replication stress leads to focus formation of Rad51 and phosphorylated DNA-PKcs, key components of the homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways, respectively. Down-regulation of Rad51, DNA-PKcs, or Ligase IV, an additional component of the NHEJ repair pathway, leads to a significant increase in fragile site expression under replication stress. Replication stress also results in focus formation of the DSB markers, MDC1 and gammaH2AX. These foci colocalized with those of Rad51 and phospho-DNA-PKcs. Furthermore, gammaH2AX and phospho-DNA-PKcs foci were localized at expressed fragile sites on metaphase chromosomes. These findings suggest that DSBs are formed at common fragile sites as a result of replication perturbation. The repair of these breaks by both HR and NHEJ pathways is essential for chromosomal stability at these sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16291645      PMCID: PMC1283964          DOI: 10.1101/gad.340905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  72 in total

Review 1.  The mechanism of non-homologous end-joining: a synopsis of synapsis.

Authors:  Eric Weterings; Dik C van Gent
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004-11-02

2.  After double-strand break induction by UV-A, homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining cooperate at the same DSB if both systems are available.

Authors:  Alexander Rapp; Karl Otto Greulich
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-09-14       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Common fragile sites: G-band characteristics within an R-band.

Authors:  D Mishmar; Y Mandel-Gutfreund; H Margalit; A Rahat; B Kerem
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Aphidicolin prevents mitotic cell division by interfering with the activity of DNA polymerase-alpha.

Authors:  S Ikegami; T Taguchi; M Ohashi; M Oguro; H Nagano; Y Mano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Conservation of aphidicolin-induced fragile sites in Papionini (Primates) species and humans.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Francisca Garcia; Lutz Frönicke; Montserrat Ponsà; Josep Egozcue; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  BRCA1 is required for common-fragile-site stability via its G2/M checkpoint function.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Bo Xu; Sandra G Durkin; Anne M Casper; Michael B Kastan; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Role of DNA-PK in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Sandeep Burma; David J Chen
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

8.  Characterization of a conserved aphidicolin-sensitive common fragile site at human 4q22 and mouse 6C1: possible association with an inherited disease and cancer.

Authors:  Lorène Rozier; Eliane El-Achkar; Françoise Apiou; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Chromosomal instability at common fragile sites in Seckel syndrome.

Authors:  Anne M Casper; Sandra G Durkin; Martin F Arlt; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Allele-specific late replication and fragility of the most active common fragile site, FRA3B.

Authors:  L Wang; J Darling; J S Zhang; H Huang; W Liu; D I Smith
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  62 in total

Review 1.  Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

Authors:  Anja Weise; Kristin Mrasek; Elisabeth Klein; Milene Mulatinho; Juan C Llerena; David Hardekopf; Sona Pekova; Samarth Bhatt; Nadezda Kosyakova; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Evidence for chromosome fragility at the frataxin locus in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Bruce Hayward; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Unraveling the complexities of DNA-dependent protein kinase autophosphorylation.

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Seiji Sugiman-Marangos; Pamela VanderVere-Carozza; Mike Wagner; John Turchi; Susan P Lees-Miller; Murray S Junop; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  An AT-rich sequence in human common fragile site FRA16D causes fork stalling and chromosome breakage in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Haihua Zhang; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  p53 mediates senescence-like arrest induced by chronic replicational stress.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Linda J Wheeler; Christopher K Mathews; James DeGregori
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  A novel mechanistic spectrum underlies glaucoma-associated chromosome 6p25 copy number variation.

Authors:  Bhaskar Chanda; Mika Asai-Coakwell; Ming Ye; Andrew J Mungall; Margaret Barrow; William B Dobyns; Hourinaz Behesti; Jane C Sowden; Nigel P Carter; Michael A Walter; Ordan J Lehmann
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 8.  Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision?

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer.

Authors:  Yingguang Frank Chan; Melissa E Marks; Felicity C Jones; Guadalupe Villarreal; Michael D Shapiro; Shannon D Brady; Audrey M Southwick; Devin M Absher; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Richard M Myers; Dmitri Petrov; Bjarni Jónsson; Dolph Schluter; Michael A Bell; David M Kingsley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The role of DNA damage response pathways in chromosome fragility in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Daman Kumari; Valentina Somma; Asako J Nakamura; William M Bonner; Ettoré D'Ambrosio; Karen Usdin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.