Literature DB >> 16384935

Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast.

Anthony Admire1, Lisa Shanks, Nicole Danzl, Mei Wang, Ulli Weier, William Stevens, Elizabeth Hunt, Ted Weinert.   

Abstract

We report here that a normal budding yeast chromosome (ChrVII) can undergo remarkable cycles of chromosome instability. The events associated with cycles of instability caused a distinctive "sectoring" of colonies on selective agar plates. We found that instability initiated at any of several sites on ChrVII, and was sharply increased by the disruption of DNA replication or by defects in checkpoint controls. We studied in detail the cycles of instability associated with one particular chromosomal site (the "403 site"). This site contained multiple tRNA genes known to stall replication forks, and when deleted, the overall frequency of sectoring was reduced. Instability of the 403 site involved multiple nonallelic recombination events that led to the formation of a monocentric translocation. This translocation remained unstable, frequently undergoing either loss or recombination events linked to the translocation junction. These results suggest a model in which instability initiates at specific chromosomal sites that stall replication forks. Forks not stabilized by checkpoint proteins break and undergo multiple rounds of nonallelic recombination to form translocations. Some translocations remain unstable because they join two "incompatible" chromosomal regions. Cycles of instability of this normal yeast chromosome may be relevant to chromosome instability of mammalian fragile sites and of chromosomes in cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16384935      PMCID: PMC1356108          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1392506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  61 in total

1.  Transposon mutagenesis for the analysis of protein production, function, and localization.

Authors:  P Ross-Macdonald; A Sheehan; C Friddle; G S Roeder; M Snyder
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 2.  Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.

Authors:  Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain.

Authors:  Elçin Unal; Ayelet Arbel-Eden; Ulrike Sattler; Robert Shroff; Michael Lichten; James E Haber; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Francene J Lemoine; Natasha P Degtyareva; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Eukaryotic DNA mismatch repair.

Authors:  R D Kolodner; G T Marsischky
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice.

Authors:  J M Grushcow; T M Holzen; K J Park; T Weinert; M Lichten; D K Bishop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  B A Desany; A A Alcasabas; J B Bachant; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  A suppressor of two essential checkpoint genes identifies a novel protein that negatively affects dNTP pools.

Authors:  X Zhao; E G Muller; R Rothstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Shelterin: the protein complex that shapes and safeguards human telomeres.

Authors:  Titia de Lange
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 12.890

View more
  71 in total

1.  Cyclin regulation by the s phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Gloria Palou; Roger Palou; Angel Guerra-Moreno; Alba Duch; Anna Travesa; David G Quintana
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  The DNA helicase Pfh1 promotes fork merging at replication termination sites to ensure genome stability.

Authors:  Roland Steinacher; Fekret Osman; Jacob Z Dalgaard; Alexander Lorenz; Matthew C Whitby
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Replication stress checkpoint signaling controls tRNA gene transcription.

Authors:  Vesna C Nguyen; Brett W Clelland; Darren J Hockman; Sonya L Kujat-Choy; Holly E Mewhort; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Delineating Rearrangements in Single Yeast Artificial Chromosomes by Quantitative DNA Fiber Mapping.

Authors:  Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Karin M Greulich-Bode; Jenny Wu; Thomas Duell
Journal:  Open Genomics J       Date:  2009-10-09

6.  The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  Anna Azvolinsky; Stephen Dunaway; Jorge Z Torres; Jessica B Bessler; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  The F-box protein Dia2 overcomes replication impedance to promote genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Deborah Blake; Brian Luke; Pamela Kanellis; Paul Jorgensen; Theo Goh; Sonya Penfold; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Daniel Durocher; Matthias Peter; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Chromosome breakage and repair.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time?

Authors:  Karim Labib; Ben Hodgson
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.

Authors:  Bidyut K Mohanty; Narendra K Bairwa; Deepak Bastia
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.