Literature DB >> 15232713

Near monochromatic X-rays for digital slot-scan mammography: initial findings.

Felix Diekmann1, S Diekmann, K Richter, U Bick, T Fischer, R Lawaczeck, W-R Press, K Schön, H-J Weinmann, V Arkadiev, A Bjeoumikhov, N Langhoff, J Rabe, P Roth, J Tilgner, R Wedell, M Krumrey, U Linke, G Ulm, B Hamm.   

Abstract

X-ray spectra are composed of a broad bremsspectrum and anode-characteristic emission lines. In mammography typically molybdenum (Mo), rhodium (Rh) or tungsten (W) anodes are used in combination with Mo, Rh or aluminium filters. Only the photons with energies between 17 and 22 keV of the resulting spectrum are suitable for the soft tissue imaging needed for mammography. The aim of this article is to present first results obtained with a monochromator module mounted at the exit of the X-ray tube of a conventional clinical mammography unit. The experimental setup consists of a Siemens Mammomat 300, an X-ray monochromator module and a linear array detector for image acquisition. The technique is similar to the slot-scan technique known from digital mammography. The experimental machine allows to obtain images both with polychromatic and monochromatic X-rays. Initial evaluation of the system was performed by examination of a contrast-detail phantom (CD-MAM-phantom, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). Images done with the new monochromatic technique were compared to images of the phantom done with polychromatic spectra, with film-screen mammography as well as with digital mammography. The new technique with monochromatic slot-scan mammography resulted in correct identification of 93% of the phantom. Digital slot-scan mammography with polychromatic beam resulted in correct identification of 87%, digital full-field mammography in 83% and conventional film-screen mammography in 70% of the phantom. The results suggest that monochromatization has a potential for improving image quality or decreasing dose in X-ray mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15232713     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2378-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Investigation of 125I as an isotopic source for mammography.

Authors:  R Fairchild; H L Atkins; E Lebowitz; D Greenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1975 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 3.  Research at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility medical beamline.

Authors:  W Thomlinson; P Berkvens; G Berruyer; B Bertrand; H Blattmann; E Brauer-Krisch; T Brochard; A M Charvet; S Corde; M Dimichiel; H Elleaume; F Estève; S Fiedler; J A Laissue; J E Le Bas; G Le Duc; N Lyubimova; C Nemoz; M Renier; D N Slatkin; P Spanne; P Suortti
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.770

Review 4.  Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review.

Authors:  Suzie J Otto; Jacques Fracheboud; Caspar W N Looman; Mireille J M Broeders; Rob Boer; Jan H C L Hendriks; André L M Verbeek; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].

Authors:  F Diekmann; S Diekmann; S Berzeg; U Bick; T Fischer; B Hamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-06

6.  Measured molecular coherent scattering form factors of animal tissues, plastics and human breast tissue.

Authors:  D E Peplow; K Verghese
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Near-monochromatic X-ray beams produced by the free electron laser and Compton backscatter.

Authors:  F E Carroll; J W Waters; R R Price; C A Brau; C F Roos; N H Tolk; D R Pickens; W H Stephens
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography.

Authors:  R J Jennings; R J Eastgate; M P Siedband; D L Ergun
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche; O Olsen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Full field digital mammography scanner.

Authors:  M M Tesic; M F Piccaro; B Munier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Clinical results of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice.

Authors:  Wouter J H Veldkamp; Lucia J M Kroft; Mireille V Boot; Bart J A Mertens; Jacob Geleijns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography.

Authors:  Felix Diekmann; Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Breast tomosynthesis with monochromatic beams: a feasibility study using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  A Malliori; K Bliznakova; I Sechopoulos; Z Kamarianakis; B Fei; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography.

Authors:  K Hussein; C L Vaughan; T S Douglas
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.609

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.