Literature DB >> 17661053

Tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography: recent advances in digital mammography.

Felix Diekmann1, Ulrich Bick.   

Abstract

Digital mammography is more and more replacing conventional mammography. Initial concerns about an inferior image quality of digital mammography have been largely overcome and recent studies even show digital mammography to be superior in women with dense breasts, while at the same time reducing radiation exposure. Nevertheless, an important limitation of digital mammography remains: namely, the fact that summation may obscure lesions in dense breast tissue. However, digital mammography offers the option of so-called advanced applications, and two of these, contrast-enhanced mammography and tomosynthesis, are promising candidates for improving the detection of breast lesions otherwise obscured by the summation of dense tissue. Two techniques of contrast-enhanced mammography are available: temporal subtraction of images acquired before and after contrast administration and the so-called dual-energy technique, which means that pairs of low/high-energy images acquired after contrast administration are subtracted. Tomosynthesis on the other hand provides three-dimensional information on the breast. The images are acquired with different angulations of the X-ray tube while the object or detector is static. Various reconstruction algorithms can then be applied to the set of typically nine to 28 source images to reconstruct 1-mm slices with a reduced risk of obscuring pathology. Combinations of both advanced applications have only been investigated in individual experimental studies; more advanced software algorithms and CAD systems are still in their infancy and have only undergone preliminary clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661053     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0715-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [Dose reduction through gridless technique in digital full-field mammography].

Authors:  F Diekmann; S Diekmann; S Berzeg; U Bick; T Fischer; B Hamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-06

3.  Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Hans H Schild; Nuschin Morakkabati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Philipp Bernhardt; Thomas Mertelmeier; Martin Hoheisel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara C Chen; Ann-Katherine Carton; Michael Albert; Emily F Conant; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.

Authors:  Paula Toroi; Federica Zanca; Kenneth C Young; Chantal van Ongeval; Guy Marchal; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques.

Authors:  John M Boone; J Anthony Seibert; Cha-Mei Tang; Steve M Lane
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Etta D Pisano; Constantine Gatsonis; Edward Hendrick; Martin Yaffe; Janet K Baum; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Emily F Conant; Laurie L Fajardo; Lawrence Bassett; Carl D'Orsi; Roberta Jong; Murray Rebner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe; Mia Skarpathiotakis; Rene S Shumak; Nathalie M Danjoux; Anoma Gunesekara; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis : technical principles, current clinical relevance and future perspectives].

Authors:  K Hellerhoff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Contrast-enhanced dual energy mammography with a novel anode/filter combination and artifact reduction: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Thomas Knogler; Peter Homolka; Mathias Hörnig; Robert Leithner; Georg Langs; Martin Waitzbauer; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Sabine Leitner; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; T Wacker; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Radiomics Analysis for Noninvasive Breast Cancer Characterization: Initial Results.

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Katja Pinker; Doris Leithner; Janice Sung; Daly Avendano; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine Jochelson
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Pilot Study on the Detection of Simulated Lesions Using a 2D and 3D Digital Full-Field Mammography System with a Newly Developed High Resolution Detector Based on Two Shifts of a-Se.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; M Bani; M P Lux; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; P A Fasching; B Adamietz; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Lynda C Ikejimba; Nooshin Kiarashi; Sujata V Ghate; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Julie Sogani; Elizabeth A Morris; Jennifer B Kaplan; Donna D'Alessio; Debra Goldman; Chaya S Moskowitz; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.