Literature DB >> 25082791

Breast tomosynthesis with monochromatic beams: a feasibility study using Monte Carlo simulations.

A Malliori1, K Bliznakova, I Sechopoulos, Z Kamarianakis, B Fei, N Pallikarakis.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact on image quality of using monochromatic beams for lower dose breast tomosynthesis (BT). For this purpose, modeling and simulation of BT and mammography imaging processes have been performed using two x-ray beams: one at 28 kVp and a monochromatic one at 19 keV at different entrance surface air kerma ranging between 0.16 and 5.5 mGy. Two 4 cm thick computational breast models, in a compressed state, were used: one simple homogeneous and one heterogeneous based on CT breast images, with compositions of 50% glandular-50% adipose and 40% glandular-60% adipose tissues by weight, respectively. Modeled lesions, representing masses and calcifications, were inserted within these breast phantoms. X-ray transport in the breast models was simulated with previously developed and validated Monte Carlo application. Results showed that, for the same incident photon fluence, the use of the monochromatic beam in BT resulted in higher image quality compared to the one using polychromatic acquisition, especially in terms of contrast. For the homogenous phantom, the improvement ranged between 15% and 22% for calcifications and masses, respectively, while for the heterogeneous one this improvement was in the order of 33% for the masses and 17% for the calcifications. For different exposures, comparable image quality in terms of signal-difference-to-noise ratio and higher contrast for all features was obtained when using a monochromatic 19 keV beam at a lower mean glandular dose, compared to the polychromatic one. Monochromatic images also provide better detail and, in combination with BT, can lead to substantial improvement in visualization of features, and particularly better edge detection of low-contrast masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25082791      PMCID: PMC4164851          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/16/4681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  25 in total

1.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  D R Dance; A K Thilander; M Sandborg; C L Skinner; I A Castellano; G A Carlsson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  An integrated research tool for X-ray imaging simulation.

Authors:  D Lazos; K Bliznakova; Z Kolitsi; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.

Authors:  D R Dance; C L Skinner; K C Young; J R Beckett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A prototype of a quasi-monochromatic system for mammography applications.

Authors:  P Baldelli; A Taibi; A Tuffanelli; M C Gilardoni; M Gambaccini
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study.

Authors:  Philipp Bernhardt; Thomas Mertelmeier; Martin Hoheisel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Experimental validation of a radiographic simulation code using breast phantom for X-ray imaging.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; R Speller; J Horrocks; P Liaparinos; Z Kolitsi; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 7.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.

Authors:  A C Thilander-Klang; P H Ackerholm; I C Berlin; N G Bjurstam; S L Mattsson; L G Månsson; C von Schéele; S J Thunberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Image quality evaluation of breast tomosynthesis with synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  A Malliori; K Bliznakova; R D Speller; J A Horrocks; L Rigon; G Tromba; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Clinical digital breast tomosynthesis system: dosimetric characterization.

Authors:  Steve Si Jia Feng; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Digital breast tomosynthesis].

Authors:  H Preibsch; K C Siegmann-Luz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.