Literature DB >> 19229099

Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography.

K Hussein1, C L Vaughan, T S Douglas.   

Abstract

This paper presents a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography. A recently developed prototype linear slot-scanning digital mammography system was used for model validation; image quality metrics such as image contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. The results were in good agreement with values measured using a physical breast-equivalent phantom designed for mammography. The estimated pixel intensity of the mathematical phantom, the analogue-to-digital conversion gain and the detector additive noise showed good agreement with measured values with correlation of nearly 1. An application of the model, to examine the feasibility of using a monochromatic filter for dose reduction and improvement of image quality in slot-scanning digital mammography, is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19229099      PMCID: PMC2839081          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  26 in total

1.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors.

Authors:  K Stierstorfer; M Spahn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Optimization of x-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography).

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a digital x-ray detector: comparison of three evaluations using a common image data set.

Authors:  Ulrich Neitzel; Susanne Günther-Kohfahl; Giovanni Borasi; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A new test phantom with different breast tissue compositions for image quality assessment in conventional and digital mammography.

Authors:  Marc Pachoud; D Lepori; Jean-François Valley; Francis R Verdun
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities.

Authors:  B J Irving; G J Maree; E R Hering; T S Douglas
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Accurate segmentation and contrast measurement of microcalcifications in mammograms: a phantom study.

Authors:  W J Veldkamp; N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; L E Antonuk; Y el-Mohri; J Yorkston; W Huang; I A Cunningham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Survey on image quality and dose levels used in Europe for mammography.

Authors:  F R Verdun; R Moeckli; J F Valley; F Bochud; C Hessler
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems.

Authors:  I A Cunningham; M S Westmore; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  A virtual trial framework for quantifying the detectability of masses in breast tomosynthesis projection data.

Authors:  Stefano Young; Predrag R Bakic; Kyle J Myers; Robert J Jennings; Subok Park
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan; Tania S Douglas; Qonita Said-Hartley; Roland V Baasch; James A Boonzaier; Brian C Goemans; John Harverson; Michael W Mingay; Shuaib Omar; Raphael V Smith; Nielen C Venter; Heidi S Wilson
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 1.605

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.