Literature DB >> 15744483

[Clinical results of digital mammography].

R Schulz-Wendtland1, K-P Hermann, W Bautz.   

Abstract

Digital mammography is the technology of the future in breast diagnosis. This article provides an overview of all digital mammography units admitted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), results of clinical studies, soft copy reading, CAD (computer aided detection), and presents an overview on possible further developments. It is obvious that clinical results are equivalent to conventional screen film mammography and digital mammography.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744483     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-005-1175-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  43 in total

Review 1.  Current status of full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  E D Pisano; M J Yaffe; B M Hemminger; R E Hendrick; L T Niklason; A D Maidment; C M Kimme-Smith; S A Feig; E A Sickles; M P Braeuning
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms.

Authors:  P E Undrill; A D O'Kane; F J Gilbert
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  [Full-field digital mammography: a phantom study for detection of microcalcification].

Authors:  S Obenauer; K P Hermann; C Schorn; M Funke; U Fischer; E Grabbe
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2000-07

4.  Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; E Wenkel; A Schmid; K Imhoff; W Bautz
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-06

5.  Digital mammography.

Authors:  S A Feig; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Authors:  J M Lewin; R E Hendrick; C J D'Orsi; P K Isaacs; L J Moss; A Karellas; G A Sisney; C C Kuni; G R Cutter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Scanned-projection digital mammography.

Authors:  R M Nishikawa; G E Mawdsley; A Fenster; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms.

Authors:  Nico Karssemeijer; Johannes D M Otten; Andre L M Verbeek; Johanna H Groenewoud; Harry J de Koning; Jan H C L Hendriks; Roland Holland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions.

Authors:  W P Kegelmeyer; J M Pruneda; P D Bourland; A Hillis; M W Riggs; M L Nipper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  John M Lewin; Carl J D'Orsi; R Edward Hendrick; Lawrence J Moss; Pamela K Isaacs; Andrew Karellas; Gary R Cutter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Current situation and future perspectives of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; T Wacker; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Mammography screening].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; N Becker; K Bock; K Anders; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.