Literature DB >> 15108104

The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

E A M Heijnsdijk1, A Pasdeloup, A J van der Pijl, J Dankelman, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the limited force feedback provided by laparoscopic instruments, surgeons may have difficulty in applying the appropriate force on the tissue. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of force feedback and visual feedback on the exerted pinch force.
METHODS: A grasper with a force sensor in the jaws was developed. Subjects with and without laparoscopic experience grasped and pulled pig bowel with a force of 5 N. The applied pinch force was measured during tasks of 1-s and 1-min duration. Visual feedback was provided in half the measurements. Force feedback was adjusted by changing the mechanical efficiency of the forceps from 30% to 90%.
RESULTS: The mean pinch force applied was 6.8 N (+/-0.5), whereas the force to prevent slippage was 3.0 N (+/-0.4). Improving the mechanical efficiency had no effect on the pinch force for the 1-s measurements. The amount of excessive pinch force when holding tissue for 1 min was lower at 30% mechanical efficiency compared with 90% (105% vs 131%, p = 0.04). The tissue slipped more often when the subject had no visual feedback (2% vs 8%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Force feedback and visual feedback play a more limited role than expected in the task of grasping tissue with laparoscopic forceps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15108104     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9244-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?

Authors:  K T den Boer; J L Herder; W Sjoerdsma; D W Meijer; D J Gouma; H G Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery--experimental performance evaluation.

Authors:  J Rosen; B Hannaford; M P MacFarlane; M N Sinanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  O S Bholat; R S Haluck; W B Murray; P J Gorman; T M Krummel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Forces and displacements in colon surgery.

Authors:  H de Visser; E A M Heijnsdijk; J L Herder; P V Pistecky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; Th J M V van Vroonhoven; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  A new tool for minor-access surgery.

Authors:  M Balázs; H Feussner; G Hirzinger; K Omote; A Ungeheuer
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  1998 May-Jun

8.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  The optimal mechanical efficiency of laparoscopic forceps.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user's level of experience.

Authors:  D V Avgerinos; K H Goodell; S Waxberg; C G L Cao; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  P Lamata; E J Gómez; F M Sánchez-Margallo; F Lamata; F del Pozo; J Usón
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation of a new basic virtual reality simulator for training of basic endoscopic skills: the SIMENDO.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; L J Monteny; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?

Authors:  Caroline G L Cao; Mi Zhou; Daniel B Jones; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Magdalena K Chmarra; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank-Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Indirect measurement of pinch and pull forces at the shaft of laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  John J van den Dobbelsteen; Ruben A Lee; Maarten van Noorden; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Force measurement platform for training and assessment of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Tim Horeman; Sharon P Rodrigues; Frank-Willem Jansen; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.