Literature DB >> 16132320

Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user's level of experience.

D V Avgerinos1, K H Goodell, S Waxberg, C G L Cao, S D Schwaitzberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent focus on quality of care and patient safety has been accompanied by increased interest in standardizing the training for laparoscopic surgeons. Studies have shown that laparoscopic simulators can be used to train surgical skills. Therefore, we designed an experiment to compare the effectiveness of two popular training systems. One system was based on a physical model, whereas the other used a virtual reality model.
METHODS: A total of 32 medical students and residents were tested on both simulators. Time required for task completion and number of errors committed were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: The physical training system differentiated among experience levels on three of the five tasks when time was used as a measure and four of five tasks when score was used, whereas the virtual reality system yielded statistically significant results in eight of 13 tasks for time and in five of 13 tasks for score.
CONCLUSION: The physical model is more sensitive than the virtual reality one in detecting differences in levels of laparoscopic surgical experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132320     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8256-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Does training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance?

Authors:  G Ahlberg; T Heikkinen; L Iselius; C-E Leijonmarck; J Rutqvist; D Arvidsson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?

Authors:  D J Scott; P C Bergen; R V Rege; R Laycock; S T Tesfay; R J Valentine; D M Euhus; D R Jeyarajah; W M Thompson; D B Jones
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; A J van der Pijl; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Ergonomics in the operating room.

Authors:  R Berguer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The Visible Human data set: an image resource for anatomical visualization.

Authors:  M J Ackerman; V M Spitzer; A L Scherzinger; D G Whitlock
Journal:  Medinfo       Date:  1995

Review 9.  Virtual reality and laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Coleman; C C Nduka; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparison of the sensitivity of physical and virtual laparoscopic surgical training simulators to the user's level of experience.

Authors:  P Cosman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Optimal training design for procedural motor skills: a review and application to laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Edward N Spruit; Guido P H Band; Jaap F Hamming; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-11-08

4.  Force feedback and basic laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Magdalena K Chmarra; Jenny Dankelman; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Frank-Willem Jansen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review.

Authors:  Benjamin Zendejas; Raaj K Ruparel; David A Cook
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training.

Authors:  Mona W Schmidt; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Marc L Schmidt; Erica Wennberg; Carly R Garrow; Sang Paik; Laura Benner; Marlies P Schijven; Beat P Müller-Stich; Felix Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Erlend Fagertun Hofstad; Thomas Langø; Ronald Mårvik; Magdalena Karolina Chmarra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Malpractice carrier underwrites Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery training and testing: a benchmark for patient safety.

Authors:  Alexandre Y Derevianko; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Shawn Tsuda; Limaris Barrios; David C Brooks; Mark P Callery; David Fobert; Noel Irias; David W Rattner; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez-Lopez; Marcelo Fabián Maina; Francesc Saigí-Rubió
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.