Literature DB >> 11988799

Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers.

E A M Heijnsdijk1, J Dankelman, D J Gouma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manipulating tissue with laparoscopic forceps is more difficult than using the hands. This study investigates the effectiveness of grasping and the duration of tissue-clamping using laparoscopic forceps.
METHODS: Video recordings of 10 laparoscopic colectomies and 15 cholecystectomies were analyzed using time-action analysis.
RESULTS: The results indicated that 62% of the grasping actions were successful: the tissue was clamped sufficiently to perform an action. Of all the clamping actions on the colon, 10% were repeated actions. On the gallbladder 7% were repeated actions. The bowel slipped out of the grasper in 7% of the clamping actions, whereas the gallbladder slipped in 17%. In 89%, the colon was clamped less than 1 min. The maximum clamping time for colon clamps was 7 min for the colon, and 55 min for the gallbladder.
CONCLUSION: The low percentage of successful grasping actions indicates that the design of laparoscopic graspers is not optimal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11988799     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-9179-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

1.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?

Authors:  K T den Boer; J L Herder; W Sjoerdsma; D W Meijer; D J Gouma; H G Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  J A Cartmill; A J Shakeshaft; W R Walsh; C J Martin
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-02

3.  Quantitative standardised analysis of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Authors:  G P Claus; W Sjoerdsma; A Jansen; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1995-08

4.  Mechanism, management, and prevention of laparoscopic bowel injuries.

Authors:  P Schrenk; R Woisetschläger; R Rieger; W Wayand
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Intraabdominal contamination after gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its complications.

Authors:  T Kimura; H Goto; Y Takeuchi; M Yoshida; T Kobayashi; S Sakuramachi; Y Harada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Grasper trauma during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D D Marucci; A J Shakeshaft; J A Cartmill; M R Cox; S G Adams; C J Martin
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-08

7.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 8.  Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection.

Authors:  M Patkin; L Isabel
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1995-04
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; H de Visser; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; A J van der Pijl; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation.

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Martin J Binser; Fabian Rieber; Chi-Nghia Ho; Marc O Schurr; Gerhard F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of fenestrations and surface profiling on the holding of tissue by parallel occlusion laparoscopic graspers.

Authors:  Andrew W Brown; Stuart I Brown; Donald McLean; Zhigang Wang; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of laparoscopic grasper force transmission ratio on grasp control.

Authors:  Eleonora P Westebring-van der Putten; John J van den Dobbelsteen; Richard H M Goossens; Jack J Jakimowicz; Jenny Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Haptics - touchfeedback technology widening the horizon of medicine.

Authors:  Shalini Kapoor; Pallak Arora; Vikas Kapoor; Mahesh Jayachandran; Manish Tiwari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

8.  Magnetic retraction of bowel by intraluminal injectable cyanoacrylate-based magnetic glue.

Authors:  Zhigang Wang; Andrew Brown; Pascal André; Stuart I Brown; Gordon J Florence; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Ergonomics of laparoscopic graspers and the importance of haptic feedback: the surgeons' perspective.

Authors:  Chantal C J Alleblas; Michel P H Vleugels; Theodoor E Nieboer
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.