Literature DB >> 25380708

European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Amir Szold1, Roberto Bergamaschi, Ivo Broeders, Jenny Dankelman, Antonello Forgione, Thomas Langø, Andreas Melzer, Yoav Mintz, Salvador Morales-Conde, Michael Rhodes, Richard Satava, Chung-Ngai Tang, Ramon Vilallonga.   

Abstract

Following an extensive literature search and a consensus conference with subject matter experts the following conclusions can be drawn: 1. Robotic surgery is still at its infancy, and there is a great potential in sophisticated electromechanical systems to perform complex surgical tasks when these systems evolve. 2. To date, in the vast majority of clinical settings, there is little or no advantage in using robotic systems in general surgery in terms of clinical outcome. Dedicated parameters should be addressed, and high quality research should focus on quality of care instead of routine parameters, where a clear advantage is not to be expected. 3. Preliminary data demonstrates that robotic system have a clinical benefit in performing complex procedures in confined spaces, especially in those that are located in unfavorable anatomical locations. 4. There is a severe lack of high quality data on robotic surgery, and there is a great need for rigorously controlled, unbiased clinical trials. These trials should be urged to address the cost-effectiveness issues as well. 5. Specific areas of research should include complex hepatobiliary surgery, surgery for gastric and esophageal cancer, revisional surgery in bariatric and upper GI surgery, surgery for large adrenal masses, and rectal surgery. All these fields show some potential for a true benefit of using current robotic systems. 6. Robotic surgery requires a specific set of skills, and needs to be trained using a dedicated, structured training program that addresses the specific knowledge, safety issues and skills essential to perform this type of surgery safely and with good outcomes. It is the responsibility of the corresponding professional organizations, not the industry, to define the training and credentialing of robotic basic skills and specific procedures. 7. Due to the special economic environment in which robotic surgery is currently employed special care should be taken in the decision making process when deciding on the purchase, use and training of robotic systems in general surgery. 8. Professional organizations in the sub-specialties of general surgery should review these statements and issue detailed, specialty-specific guidelines on the use of specific robotic surgery procedures in addition to outlining the advanced robotic surgery training required to safely perform such procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380708     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  302 in total

1.  Robot-assisted choledochotomy: feasibility.

Authors:  G Roeyen; T Chapelle; D Ysebaert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Genevieve Dulan; Deborah C Hogg; Robert V Rege; Cathryn E Powers; Seifu T Tesfay; Linda S Hynan; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database.

Authors:  Sero Andonian; Zeph Okeke; Deidre A Okeke; Ardeshir Rastinehad; Brian A Vanderbrink; Lee Richstone; Benjamin R Lee
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery.

Authors:  M E Hagen; J J Meehan; I Inan; P Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  W A Draaisma; J P Ruurda; R C H Scheffer; R K J Simmermacher; H G Gooszen; H G Rijnhart-de Jong; E Buskens; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; K Klintrup; H Takala; M Vierimaa; P Ohtonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

8.  Robot-assisted posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy using single-port access: technical feasibility and preliminary results.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Park; Soo Young Kim; Cho-Rok Lee; Seulkee Park; Jun Soo Jeong; Sang-Wook Kang; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung; Cheong Soo Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resection of sigmoid colon cancer: comparative study of long-term oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Dae Ro Lim; Byung Soh Min; Min Sung Kim; Sami Alasari; Gangmi Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  31 in total

1.  Making the Jump: A Qualitative Analysis on the Transition From Bedside Assistant to Console Surgeon in Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Hannah M Hollandsworth; Arielle M Lee; Jenny Lam; Nicole E Lopez; Benjamin Abbadessa; Samuel Eisenstein; Bard C Cosman; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Lisa A Parry
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.

Authors:  Walaa F Abdelmoaty; Christy M Dunst; Chris Neighorn; Lee L Swanstrom; Chet W Hammill
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  [Robotics in the operating room : Out of the niche into widespread application].

Authors:  J Kirchberg; T Mees; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Use of robotics in liver donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Fabrizio Di Benedetto; Paolo Magistri; Karim J Halazun
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  [Robot-assisted surgery - Progress or expensive toy? : Matched-pair comparative analysis of robot-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  R Albrecht; D Haase; R Zippel; H Koch; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Vittorio Grazio Perrone; Mario Miccoli; Stefania Brozzetti; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

7.  Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon's experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the da Vinci Si.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Simone Guadagni; Valentina Lorenzoni; Gregorio Di Franco; Luigi Cobuccio; Matteo Palmeri; Giovanni Caprili; Cristiano D'Isidoro; Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Giulio Di Candio; Franco Mosca; Giuseppe Turchetti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-07-31       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Bariatric Procedure: a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Rebecchi; Elettra Ugliono; Marco Ettore Allaix; Mauro Toppino; Alessandro Borello; Mario Morino
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series.

Authors:  Yinzhe Xu; Hongguang Wang; Webin Ji; Maosheng Tang; Hao Li; Jianjun Leng; Xuan Meng; Jiahong Dong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures.

Authors:  Rana M Higgins; Matthew J Frelich; Matthew E Bosler; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.