Literature DB >> 16858535

Tissue consistency perception in laparoscopy to define the level of fidelity in virtual reality simulation.

P Lamata1, E J Gómez, F M Sánchez-Margallo, F Lamata, F del Pozo, J Usón.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: What degree of fidelity must a laparoscopic simulator have to achieve a training objective? This difficult question is addressed by studying the sensory interaction of surgeons in terms of a surgical skill: tissue consistency perception.
METHODS: A method for characterizing surgeon sensory interaction has been defined and applied in an effort to determine the relative importance of three components of perceptual surgical skill: visual cues, haptic information, and previous surgical knowledge and experience. Expert, intermediate, and novel surgeons were enrolled in the study. Users were asked to rank tissue consistency in four different conditions: a description of the tissue alone (Q), visual information alone (VI), tactile information alone (TI), and both visual and tactile information (VTI). Agreement between these stages was assessed by a coefficient of determination (R2).
RESULTS: Tissue is a determinant factor (p < 0.001) in the perception of tissue consistency, whereas the expertise of the surgeon is not (p = 0.289). Tissue consistency perception is based mainly on tactile information (TI-VTI agreement is high, R2 = 0.873), although little sensory substitution is present (VI-VTI agreement is low, R2 = 0.509). Agreement of Q-VI increases with experience (R2 = 0.050, 0.290, and 0.573, corresponding with to novel, intermediate, and expert surgeons), which has been associated with the "visual haptics" concept.
CONCLUSIONS: Virtual reality simulators need haptic devices with force feedback capability if tissue consistency information is to be delivered. On the other hand, the visual haptics concept has been associated with a kind of tactile memory developed by surgical experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16858535     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9269-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Sensitivity of laparoscopic dissectors. What can you feel?

Authors:  K T den Boer; J L Herder; W Sjoerdsma; D W Meijer; D J Gouma; H G Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  O S Bholat; R S Haluck; W B Murray; P J Gorman; T M Krummel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications.

Authors:  Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Computer-enhanced laparoscopic training system (CELTS): bridging the gap.

Authors:  N Stylopoulos; S Cotin; S K Maithel; M Ottensmeye; P G Jackson; R S Bardsley; P F Neumann; D W Rattner; S L Dawson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Evaluation of a laparoscopic grasper with force feedback.

Authors:  T Hu; G Tholey; J P Desai; A E Castellanos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; A J van der Pijl; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Laparoscopic skills training and assessment.

Authors:  R Aggarwal; K Moorthy; A Darzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; V B Kristiansen; J Bendix; L Bardram; J Rosenberg; P Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

1.  The role and validity of surgical simulation.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

2.  Simulation-based skills training: a qualitative interview study exploring surgical trainees' experience of stress.

Authors:  Maria Suong Tjønnås; Anita Das; Cecilie Våpenstad; Solveig Osborg Ose
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2022-10-22

3.  Performance optimization of force feedback control system in virtual vascular intervention surgery.

Authors:  Zhi Hu; Ping Cai; Peng Qin; Le Xie
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 4.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  In situ measurement and modeling of biomechanical response of human cadaveric soft tissues for physics-based surgical simulation.

Authors:  Yi-Je Lim; Dhanannjay Deo; Tejinder P Singh; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.