Literature DB >> 12215022

Robot-assisted surgical systems: a new era in laparoscopic surgery.

J P Ruurda1, Th J M V van Vroonhoven, I A M J Broeders.   

Abstract

The introduction of laparoscopic surgery offers clear advantages to patients; to surgeons, it presents the challenge of learning new remote operating techniques quite different from traditional operating. Telemanipulation, introduced in the late 1990s, was a major advance in overcoming the reduced dexterity introduced by laparoscopic techniques. This paper reviews the development of robotic systems in surgery and their role in the operating room of the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12215022      PMCID: PMC2504216          DOI: 10.1308/003588402320439621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; G Buess; B Neisius; U Voges
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A new remote-controlled endoscope positioning system for endoscopic solo surgery. The FIPS endoarm.

Authors:  G F Buess; A Arezzo; M O Schurr; F Ulmer; H Fisher; L Gumb; T Testa; C Nobman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Robotics and systems technology for advanced endoscopic procedures: experiences in general surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; A Arezzo; G F Buess
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Trocar and instrument positioning system TISKA. An assist device for endoscopic solo surgery.

Authors:  M O Schurr; A Arezzo; B Neisius; H Rininsland; H U Hilzinger; J Dorn; K Roth; G F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The evolution of minimally invasive valve surgery--2 year experience.

Authors:  F W Mohr; J F Onnasch; V Falk; T Walther; A Diegeler; R Krakor; F Schneider; R Autschbach
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Vascular applications of telepresence surgery: initial feasibility studies in swine.

Authors:  J C Bowersox; A Shah; J Jensen; J Hill; P R Cordts; P S Green
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Himpens; G Leman; G B Cadiere
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development.

Authors:  J M Sackier; Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot.

Authors:  L K Jacobs; V Shayani; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Human interface technology. An essential tool for the modern surgeon.

Authors:  R M Satava; S R Ellis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.584

  10 in total
  31 in total

1.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders; B Pulles; F M Kappelhof; C van der Werken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; A J van der Pijl; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical characteristics of remote Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of 40 cases.

Authors:  Han-Xin Zhou; Yue-Hua Guo; Xiao-Fang Yu; Shi-Yun Bao; Jia-Lin Liu; Yue Zhang; Yong-Gong Ren; Qun Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Total (Transthoracic and Transabdominal) Robotic Radical Three-Stage Esophagectomy-Initial Indian Experience.

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; Rajshekhar C Jaka
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review.

Authors:  Masayuki Watanabe; Yoshifumi Baba; Yohei Nagai; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic choledochojejunostomy.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; K W van Dongen; J Dries; I H M Borel Rinkes; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.