Literature DB >> 15104170

Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.

Hang Yin1, Machelle T Pardue.   

Abstract

To compare the recording characteristics of the DTL fiber and Jet contact lens electrodes, ERG responses were recorded from 20 normal subjects using the ISCEV standard clinical protocol. In each subject, the DTL electrode was placed in the right eye and the Jet contact lens in the left eye after 30 min of dark-adaptation. After presenting standard dark- and light-adapted stimuli, each response was analyzed for a- and b-wave amplitude and implicit time. Each subject was then asked to rate the comfort of each electrode. Responses recorded with the DTL are larger and faster for the dark-adapted dim white and red flashes. In contrast, the Jet electrode records larger responses for the dark-adapted standard flash and light-adapted flashes. Of these differences, only the standard flash is statistically significant. However, overall the DTL electrode has greater variability than the Jet electrode across all recordings. The DTL and Jet electrodes cannot be used interchangeably as demonstrated by a Bland and Altman analysis of agreement. Thus, separate normative values need to be collected for each type of electrode to accurately assess retinal function. Based on the comfort assessment of the two electrodes, the subjects preferred the DTL electrode over the Jet electrode. Due to the superior comfort level of the DTL and its similarities to the Jet contact lens electrode in ERG recordings, the DTL electrode appears to be a good alternative to the Jet electrode in routine clinical testing when used with the appropriate normative values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104170     DOI: 10.1023/b:doop.0000018395.78512.4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode.

Authors:  M Hébert; P Lachapelle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: the bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  J G Robson; L J Frishman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  The effect of gold foil electrode position on the electroretinogram in human subjects.

Authors:  A McAllan; J Sinn; G W Aylward
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Some characteristics of the C-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera.

Authors:  Y Honda
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-03-29

5.  Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude.

Authors:  S J Cringle; V A Alder; M J Brown; D Y Yu
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Experiences with the international standard for clinical electroretinography: normative values for clinical practice, interindividual and intraindividual variations and possible extensions.

Authors:  P C Jacobi; K D Miliczek; E Zrenner
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The effect of age on human cone and rod ganzfeld electroretinograms.

Authors:  R G Weleber
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  14 in total

1.  Pattern reversal ERG with LED-stimulation using cyclic summation technique.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Anselm Jünemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Pattern reversal ERG and VEP--comparison of stimulation by LED, monitor and a Maxwellian-view system.

Authors:  Barbara Link; Sylvia Rühl; Andrea Peters; Anselm Jünemann; Folkert K Horn
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?

Authors:  Jungeun Woo; Suna Jung; Mathieu Gauvin; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Consecutive unilateral recording of the two eyes affects dark-adapted ERG responses, when compared to simultaneous bilateral recording.

Authors:  Maya Ross; Hen Honig; Raaya Ezra-Elia; Eyal Banin; Alexey Obolensky; Edward Averbukh; Alexander Rosov; Elisha Gootwine; Ron Ofri
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.

Authors:  Katharine E Mortlock; Alison M Binns; Yousef H Aldebasi; Rachel V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Variability of the multifocal electroretinogram based on the type and position of the electrode.

Authors:  Ángel García-García; Francisco José Muñoz-Negrete; Gema Rebolleda
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Flash electroretinography: normative values with surface skin electrodes and no pupil dilation using a standard stimulation protocol.

Authors:  Eleftherios S Papathanasiou; Savvas S Papacostas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Frequency spectrum and amplitude analysis of dark- and light-adapted oscillatory potentials in albino mouse, rat and rabbit.

Authors:  Keqing Zhang; Gang Yao; Yuanfang Gao; Kurt J Hofeldt; Bo Lei
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram.

Authors:  Alice E Mentzer; Danielle M Eifler; Fabiano Montiani-Ferreira; Nalinee Tuntivanich; Janice Q Forcier; Simon M Petersen-Jones
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Electroretinography in dogs using a fiber electrode prototype.

Authors:  A L Pereira; F Montiani-Ferreira; V R Santos; S R Salomão; C Souza; A Berezovsky
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.