Literature DB >> 10343826

Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode.

M Hébert1, P Lachapelle.   

Abstract

Previous investigators have suggested that the DTL fibre electrode might not be suitable for the recording of replicable electroretinograms. We present experimental evidence that when used adequately, this electrode does permit the recording of highly reproducible retinal potentials.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10343826     DOI： 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00210-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN： 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  The electroretinogram recorded at the onset of dark-adaptation: understanding the origin of the scotopic oscillatory potentials.

Authors:  S Rousseau; P Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  A physiological basis for definition of the ISCEV ERG standard flash (SF) based on the photopic hill.

Authors:  P Lachapelle; M Rufiange; O Dembinska
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the Photopic Hill revisited.

Authors:  Marianne Rufiange; Sophie Rousseau; Olga Dembinska; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.

Authors:  Hang Yin; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Modelling the initial phase of the human rod photoreceptor response to the onset of steady illumination.

Authors:  Omar A R Mahroo; Vin Shen Ban; Benjamin M Bussmann; Hannah C Copley; Christopher J Hammond; Trevor D Lamb
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The DTL ERG electrode comes in different shapes and sizes: Are they all good?

Authors:  Jungeun Woo; Suna Jung; Mathieu Gauvin; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology.

Authors:  A Kurtenbach; S Kramer; T Strasser; E Zrenner; H Langrová
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Revealing a retinal facilitatory effect with the multifocal ERG.

Authors:  Dylan Vatcher; Allison L Dorfman; Youjia Shen; Jia Yue You; Vincent Sun; Ayesha Khan; Robert C Polomeno; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Rustum Karanjia; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Gabriel Izan Santos Botelho; Tatiane Luana Novele Bueno; Nívea Nunes Ferraz; Paula Yuri Sacai; Stuart Glenn Coupland; Alfredo Arrigo Sadun; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.379
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.