Literature DB >> 8082549

Experiences with the international standard for clinical electroretinography: normative values for clinical practice, interindividual and intraindividual variations and possible extensions.

P C Jacobi1, K D Miliczek, E Zrenner.   

Abstract

The international Standard for Clinical Electroretinography requires a minimum of 5 standard response types. In a sample of 20 healthy subjects, the normative values according to this standard were established. Since the distribution of amplitude and implicit time does not follow a Gaussian distribution, we have found the median value and the 1st to 99th percentile or the 5th to 95th percentile useful for determination of abnormality, presented here separately for intraindividual and interindividual variation. To improve quality and reliability, we propose that individual laboratories extend the minimum standard and record the standard responses as parts of a stimulus series of increasing intensity. The normal value of the b/a ratio can easily be established from the maximum response to the Standard for Clinical Electrophysiology standard flash, pointing to abnormalities especially in circulatory disturbances and in degenerative diseases of the retina. The b/a ratio is between 1.5 and 1.7. If flicker responses are recorded at the 1st and 10th minutes after the onset of the rod saturating adaptation light (25 cd/m2), an increase in amplitude can be observed, which in our sample has a relative value of 1.3. A reduced increase in cone response amplitudes during light adaptation might point to abnormality within the rod/cone interaction. Responses from the cone system can be further differentiated by the use of chromatic stimuli. With appropriate filters, short-wavelength cone-sensitive and long-wavelength cone-sensitive responses can be differentiated also in clinical daily practice, which might be helpful for further differentiation of cone disorders. Regular measurements of intraindividual variability can help to improve the quality of electroretinogram recordings. Medians and ranges between the 1st and 99th and the 5th and the 95th percentiles were determined for all recordings for interindividual, as well as for intraindividual variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8082549     DOI: 10.1007/bf01371126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  Electroretinogram parameters at presentation as predictors of rubeosis in central retinal vein occlusion patients.

Authors:  M E Breton; G E Quinn; S S Keene; J C Dahmen; A J Brucker
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Identification of cone mechanisms in monkey ganglion cells.

Authors:  P Gouras
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Computer-assisted spectral electroretinography in vitrectomy patients.

Authors:  P Gouras; C J Mackay; L Ivert; R N Mittl; J Neuwirth; H Eggers
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  A modified ERG technique and the results obtained in X-linked retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  G B Arden; R M Carter; C R Hogg; D J Powell; W J Ernst; G M Clover; A L Lyness; M P Quinlan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Blue-sensitive cones of the cat produce a rodlike electroretinogram.

Authors:  E Zrenner; P Gouras
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Rod electroretinograms in an elevated cyclic guanosine monophosphate-type human retinal degeneration. Comparison with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  M A Sandberg; S Miller; E L Berson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  SWS (blue) cone hypersensitivity in a newly identified retinal degeneration.

Authors:  S G Jacobson; M F Marmor; C M Kemp; R W Knighton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Improved electrode for electroretinography.

Authors:  W W Dawson; G L Trick; C A Litzkow
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Rod ERGs in children with hereditary retinal degeneration.

Authors:  D G Birch; G E Fish
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.402

View more
  26 in total

1.  The wide field multifocal electroretinogram reveals retinal dysfunction in early retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  F M Dolan; S Parks; H Hammer; D Keating
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Topography of the multifocal electroretinogram.

Authors:  W A Verdon; G Haegerstrom-Portnoy
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Guidelines for clinical electroretinography in the dog.

Authors:  Kristina Narfström; Björn Ekesten; Serge G Rosolen; Bernhard M Spiess; Christine L Percicot; Ron Ofri
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Standard full-field electroretinography in healthy preterm infants.

Authors:  Adriana Berezovsky; Nilva Simeren Bueno Moraes; Steven Nusinowitz; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Performance of the DTL electrode compared to the jet contact lens electrode in clinical testing.

Authors:  Hang Yin; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Are circadian variations in the electroretinogram evident on routine testing?

Authors:  Mira Marcus; Lorella Cabael; Michael F Marmor
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Amplitude calculation in multifocal ERG: comparison of repeatability in 30 Hz flicker and first order kernel stimulation.

Authors:  Babac A E Mazinani; Thorsten Repas; Andreas W A Weinberger; Michael A Vobig; Peter Walter
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Functional imaging of the retina using the multifocal electroretinograph: a control study.

Authors:  S Parks; D Keating; T H Williamson; A L Evans; A T Elliott; J L Jay
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Multi-centre variability of ISCEV standard ERGs in two normal adults.

Authors:  R Hamilton; A Al Abdlseaed; J Healey; M M Neveu; L Brown; D Keating; V A McBain; D Sculfor; D A Thompson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Test-retest repeatability of the pattern electroretinogram and flicker electroretinogram.

Authors:  Arthur F Resende; Carina T Sanvicente; Hamoon Eshraghi; Alberto Garcia; Kassandra Pickel; Qiang Zhang; Michael Waisbourd; L Jay Katz
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.