Literature DB >> 15026925

Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.

A G Gallagher1, A B Lederman, K McGlade, R M Satava, C D Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing constraints on the time and resources needed to train surgeons have led to a new emphasis on finding innovative ways to teach surgical skills outside the operating room. Virtual reality training has been proposed as a method to both instruct surgical students and evaluate the psychomotor components of minimally invasive surgery ex vivo.
METHODS: The performance of 100 laparoscopic novices was compared to that of 12 experienced (>50 minimally invasive procedures) and 12 inexperienced (<10 minimally invasive procedures) laparoscopic surgeons. The values of the experienced surgeons' performance were used as benchmark comparators (or criterion measures). Each subject completed six tasks on the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer-Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) three times. The outcome measures were time to complete the task, number of errors, economy of instrument movement, and economy of diathermy.
RESULTS: After three trials, the mean performance of the medical students approached that of the experienced surgeons. However, 7-27% of the scores of the students fell more than two SD below the mean scores of the experienced surgeons (the criterion level).
CONCLUSIONS: The MIST-VR system is capable of evaluating the psychomotor skills necessary in laparoscopic surgery and discriminating between experts and novices. Furthermore, although some novices improved their skills quickly, a subset had difficulty acquiring the psychomotor skills. The MIST-VR may be useful in identifying that subset of novices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15026925     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8176-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task.

Authors:  J Torkington; S G Smith; B I Rees; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  S S McNatt; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Assessing laparoscopic manipulative skills.

Authors:  C D Smith; T M Farrell; S S McNatt; R E Metreveli
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The case for fellowships in gastrointestinal and laparoendoscopic surgery.

Authors:  John G Hunter
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Randomly alternating image presentation during laparoscopic training leads to faster automation to the "fulcrum effect".

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; N McClure
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration.

Authors:  I R Crothers; A G Gallagher; N McClure; D T James; J McGuigan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition.

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; K McGlade; N McClure
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  41 in total

1.  Observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA) for competency assessment in laparoscopic colorectal surgery at the specialist level.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Amjad Parvaiz; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Anatomical changes due to pneumoperitoneum analyzed by MRI: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  F M Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; R Latorre; J Maestre; L Correa; J B Pagador; L F Sánchez-Peralta; J A Sánchez-Margallo; J Usón-Gargallo
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; H McCarthy; J I Lew; A Egan; P Christos; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators.

Authors:  F J Carter; M P Schijven; R Aggarwal; T Grantcharov; N K Francis; G B Hanna; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills.

Authors:  J A Windsor; F Zoha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; D A McClusky; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator reflects clinical experience in German surgeons.

Authors:  C Langelotz; M Kilian; C Paul; W Schwenk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  The influence of different training schedules on the learning of psychomotor skills for endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; L P S Stassen; R P J van Wijk; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  First-year residents outperform third-year residents after simulation-based education in critical care medicine.

Authors:  Benjamin D Singer; Thomas C Corbridge; Clara J Schroedl; Jane E Wilcox; Elaine R Cohen; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.