Literature DB >> 11084131

A comparison between randomly alternating imaging, normal laparoscopic imaging, and virtual reality training in laparoscopic psychomotor skill acquisition.

J A Jordan1, A G Gallagher, J McGuigan, K McGlade, N McClure.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate virtual reality as a laparoscopic training device in helping surgeons to automate to the "fulcrum effect" by comparing it to time-matched training programs using randomly alternating images (ie, y-axis inverted and normal laparoscopic) and normal laparoscopic viewing conditions.
METHODS: Twenty-four participants (16 females and 8 males), were randomly assigned to minimally invasive surgery virtual reality (MIST VR), randomly alternating (between y-axis inverted and normal laparoscopic images), and normal laparoscopic imaging condition. Participants were requested to perform a 2-minute laparoscopic cutting task before and after training.
RESULTS: In the test trial participants who trained on the MIST VR performed significantly better than those in the normal laparoscopic and randomly alternating imaging conditions.
CONCLUSION: The results show that virtual reality training may provide faster skill acquisition with particular reference to automation of the fulcrum effect. MIST VR provides a new way of training laparoscopic psychomotor surgical skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084131     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00469-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course.

Authors:  M Schijven; R Klaassen; J Jakimowicz; O T Terpstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Analysis of errors in laparoscopic surgical procedures.

Authors:  N E Seymour; A G Gallagher; S A Roman; M K O'Brien; D K Andersen; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; A B Lederman; K McGlade; R M Satava; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills.

Authors:  J A Windsor; F Zoha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Can skills assessment on a virtual reality trainer predict a surgical trainee's talent in laparoscopic surgery?

Authors:  R Rosenthal; W A Gantert; D Scheidegger; D Oertli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The effect of escalating feedback on the acquisition of psychomotor skills for laparoscopy.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; Musallam Al-Akash; Neal E Seymour; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.