Literature DB >> 15624062

Construct validity for the LAPSIM laparoscopic surgical simulator.

A J Duffy1, N J Hogle, H McCarthy, J I Lew, A Egan, P Christos, D L Fowler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The skills required for laparoscopic surgery are amenable to simulator-based training. Several computerized devices are now available. We hypothesized that the LAPSIM simulator can be shown to distinguish novice from experienced laparoscopic surgeons, thus establishing construct validity.
METHODS: We tested residents of all levels and attending laparoscopic surgeons. The subjects were tested on eight software modules. Pass/fail (P/F), time (T), maximum level achieved (MLA), tissue damage (TD), motion, and error scores were compared using the t-test and analysis of variance.
RESULTS: A total of 54 subjects were tested. The most significant difference was found when we compared the most (seven attending surgeons) and least experienced (10 interns) subjects. Grasping showed significance at P/F and MLA (p < 0.03). Clip applying was significant for P/F, MLA, motion, and errors (p < 0.02). Laparoscopic suturing was significant for P/F, MLA, T, TD, as was knot error (p < 0.05). This finding held for novice, intermediate, and expert subjects (p < 0.05) and for suturing time between attending surgeons and residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-4) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: LAPSIM has construct validity to distinguish between expert and novice laparoscopists. Suture simulation can be used to discriminate between individuals at different levels of residency and expert surgeons.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15624062     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8202-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Assessment of technical skills transfer from the bench training model to the human model.

Authors:  D J Anastakis; G Regehr; R K Reznick; M Cusimano; J Murnaghan; M Brown; C Hutchison
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Visual-spatial ability correlates with efficiency of hand motion and successful surgical performance.

Authors:  Kyle R Wanzel; Stanley J Hamstra; Marco F Caminiti; Dimitri J Anastakis; Ethan D Grober; Richard K Reznick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Constantine T Frantzides; Nina Shervin; Christopher L Tebbit
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Surgical simulation - a 'good idea whose time has come'.

Authors:  H R Champion; A G Gallagher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Virtual reality training in laparoscopic surgery: a preliminary assessment of minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST VR).

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; I Crothers; J Browning
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  48 in total

1.  Retention of laparoscopic procedural skills acquired on a virtual-reality surgical trainer.

Authors:  Mathilde Maagaard; Jette Led Sorensen; Jeanett Oestergaard; Torur Dalsgaard; Teodor P Grantcharov; Bent S Ottesen; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The effect of simulation in improving students' performance in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azzam S Al-Kadi; Tyrone Donnon; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Philip Mitchell; Estifanos Debru; Neal Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  European consensus on a competency-based virtual reality training program for basic endoscopic surgical psychomotor skills.

Authors:  Koen W van Dongen; Gunnar Ahlberg; Luigi Bonavina; Fiona J Carter; Teodor P Grantcharov; Anders Hyltander; Marlies P Schijven; Alessandro Stefani; David C van der Zee; Ivo A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.

Authors:  Katherine Fairhurst; Andrew Strickland; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Development of an ex vivo simulated training model for laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Andrew Strickland; Katherine Fairhurst; Chris Lauder; Peter Hewett; Guy Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A randomized crossover trial examining low- versus high-fidelity simulation in basic laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  Swee Chin Tan; Nicholas Marlow; John Field; Meryl Altree; Wendy Babidge; Peter Hewett; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Designing a Standardized Laparoscopy Curriculum for Gynecology Residents: A Delphi Approach.

Authors:  Eliane M Shore; Guylaine G Lefebvre; Heinrich Husslein; Flemming Bjerrum; Jette Led Sorensen; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

9.  Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  C R Larsen; T Grantcharov; R Aggarwal; A Tully; J L Sørensen; T Dalsgaard; B Ottesen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.