Literature DB >> 11727073

Skill transfer from virtual reality to a real laparoscopic task.

J Torkington1, S G Smith, B I Rees, A Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To validate the usefulness of virtual reality surgical simulators, we investigated the transfer of skills achieved by their use to real tasks.
METHODS: Thirty medical students underwent a pretest using a real laparoscopic trainer. They were then randomized to the following three groups: group I received no training; group II received training using the Minimal Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR); and group III received training using conventional training exercises. Each group then underwent a posttest. Using the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD), scores were generated for time taken, distance traveled, number of movements made, and speed of instrument movement.
RESULTS: Significant changes between the MIST-VR group (group II) and the conventionally trained group (group III), were observed in the speed of movement of the left hand and the numbers of movements taken by each hand, when compared to the untrained group (group I).
CONCLUSION: The training of novices using MIST-VR yields quantifiable changes in skill that are transferable to a simple real task and are similar to the results achieved with conventional training.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11727073     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  52 in total

1.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course.

Authors:  M Schijven; R Klaassen; J Jakimowicz; O T Terpstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic skills training.

Authors:  L Villegas; B E Schneider; M P Callery; D B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other?

Authors:  Y Munz; B D Kumar; K Moorthy; S Bann; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; A B Lederman; K McGlade; R M Satava; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Technical performance: relation between surgical dexterity and technical knowledge.

Authors:  Simon Bann; Mansoor S Khan; Vivek K Datta; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A head-to-head comparison between virtual reality and physical reality simulation training for basic skills acquisition.

Authors:  Constantinos Loukas; Nikolaos Nikiteas; Dimitrios Schizas; Vasileios Lahanas; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The effect of simulation in improving students' performance in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azzam S Al-Kadi; Tyrone Donnon; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Philip Mitchell; Estifanos Debru; Neal Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The laparoscopic performance of novice surgical trainees: testing for acquisition, loss, and reacquisition of psychomotor skills.

Authors:  J A Windsor; F Zoha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.