Literature DB >> 10774973

Randomly alternating image presentation during laparoscopic training leads to faster automation to the "fulcrum effect".

J A Jordan1, A G Gallagher, J McGuigan, N McClure.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate four training programmes intended to help laparoscopic surgeons automate to the "fulcrum effect".
METHODS: A total of 32 participants (16 men, 16 women), were randomly assigned to one of four different image-viewing conditions: full binocular, y-axis inverted, normal laparoscopic and randomly alternating (between y-axis-inverted and normal laparoscopic). The subjects were requested to perform 10 trials of a simple laparoscopic cutting task, each lasting 2 minutes. Each then completed a 2-minute test under normal laparoscopic imaging conditions.
RESULTS: In the final test trial, participants who trained under the randomly alternating imaging conditions (y-axis inverted and normal laparoscopic) performed significantly better than those from the other groups.
CONCLUSION: Training under a randomly alternating viewing condition helps laparoscopic trainees automate to the "fulcrum effect" faster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10774973     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-7374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; A B Lederman; K McGlade; R M Satava; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Quantifying mental workloads of surgeons performing natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Erwin Rieder; Maria A Cassera; Danny V Martinec; Gyusung Lee; O Neely M Panton; Adrian Park; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Cyber visual training as a new method for the mastery of endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S Takiguchi; M Sekimoto; M Yasui; H Miyata; Y Fujiwara; T Yasuda; M Yano; M Monden
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems.

Authors:  J Heemskerk; R Zandbergen; J G Maessen; J W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; Musallam Al-Akash; Neal E Seymour; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Robotic cholecystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Dong Won Park; Hye Jin Yea; Se Hoon Kim; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Use of a Low-Cost Portable 3D Virtual Reality Gesture-Mediated Simulator for Training and Learning Basic Psychomotor Skills in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Development and Content Validity Study.

Authors:  Fernando Alvarez-Lopez; Marcelo Fabián Maina; Francesc Saigí-Rubió
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.