Literature DB >> 14999058

Receptive field size in V1 neurons limits acuity for perceiving disparity modulation.

Hendrikje Nienborg1, Holly Bridge, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming.   

Abstract

Disparity selectivity in the striate cortex has generally been studied with uniform disparity fields covering the receptive field (RF). In four awake behaving monkeys, we quantitatively characterized the spatial three-dimensional structure of 55 V1 RFs using random dot stereograms in which disparity varied as a sinusoidal function of vertical position ("corrugations"). At low spatial frequencies, this produced a modulation in neuronal firing at the temporal frequency of the stimulus. As the spatial frequency increased, the modulation reduced. The mean response rate changed little and was close to that produced by a uniform stimulus at the mean disparity of the corrugation. In 48 of 55 (91%) neurons, the modulation strength was a lowpass function of spatial frequency. These results are compatible with a response determined only by the weighted mean of the disparities of the dots (the weights being set by the RF envelope) and suggest that there is no disparity-based surround inhibition or selectivity for disparity gradients. This simple weighting scheme predicts a relationship between RF size and the high-frequency cutoff. Comparison with independent measurements of RF size was compatible with this. All of this behavior closely matches the binocular energy model. The mean cutoff frequency, 0.5 cycles per degree, is similar to equivalent measures of decline in human psychophysical sensitivity for such depth corrugations as a function of frequency (Tyler, 1974; Prince and Rogers, 1998; Banks et al., 2004). This suggests that human cyclopean acuity for disparity modulations is limited by the selectivity of V1 neurons. This in turn is primarily limited by the RF size, because we find no sensitivity for disparity gradients or other disparity differences within the RFs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14999058      PMCID: PMC6730443          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3887-03.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  31 in total

Review 1.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

2.  Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A quantitative explanation of responses to disparity-defined edges in macaque V2.

Authors:  C E Bredfeldt; J C A Read; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Chang-Bing Huang; Ju Liang; Yifeng Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.

Authors:  David Kane; Phillip Guan; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Decision-Related Activity in Macaque V2 for Fine Disparity Discrimination Is Not Compatible with Optimal Linear Readout.

Authors:  Stephane Clery; Bruce G Cumming; Hendrikje Nienborg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Human stereopsis is not limited by the optics of the well-focused eye.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Geunyoung Yoon; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Mapping of visual receptive fields by tomographic reconstruction.

Authors:  Gordon Pipa; Zhe Chen; Sergio Neuenschwander; Bruss Lima; Emery N Brown
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.

Authors:  Heather R Filippini; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.