Literature DB >> 17828262

Sensors for impossible stimuli may solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Jenny C A Read1, Bruce G Cumming.   

Abstract

One of the fundamental challenges of binocular vision is that objects project to different positions on the two retinas (binocular disparity). Neurons in visual cortex show two distinct types of tuning to disparity, position and phase disparity, which are the results of differences in receptive field location and profile, respectively. Here, we point out that phase disparity does not occur in natural images. Why, then, should the brain encode it? We propose that phase-disparity detectors help to work out which feature in the left eye corresponds to a given feature in the right. This correspondence problem is plagued by false matches: regions of the image that look similar, but do not correspond to the same object. We show that phase-disparity neurons tend to be more strongly activated by false matches. Thus, they may act as 'lie detectors', enabling the true correspondence to be deduced by a process of elimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17828262      PMCID: PMC2075086          DOI: 10.1038/nn1951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  38 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of stereopsis.

Authors:  B G Cumming; G C DeAngelis
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Weighted directional energy model of human stereo correspondence.

Authors:  S J Prince; R A Eagle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  R von der Heydt; H Zhou; H S Friedman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.

Authors:  S J D Prince; B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A Bayesian approach to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  P Janssen; R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4.

Authors:  David A Hinkle; Charles E Connor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Reading a population code: a multi-scale neural model for representing binocular disparity.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tsai; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Extracting 3D structure from disparity.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; Peter Janssen; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  A Bayesian model of stereopsis depth and motion direction discrimination.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  39 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Pooled, but not single-neuron, responses in macaque V4 represent a solution to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdolrahmani ا; Takahiro Doi; Hiroshi M Shiozaki; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Adaptation to natural binocular disparities in primate V1 explained by a generalized energy model.

Authors:  Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Mechanisms underlying the transformation of disparity signals from V1 to V2 in the macaque.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Solving stereo transparency with an extended coarse-to-fine disparity energy model.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Ning Qian
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Veronica Choi; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Delayed suppression shapes disparity selective responses in monkey V1.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cooperative and competitive interactions facilitate stereo computations in macaque primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Brian R Potetz; Tai Sing Lee
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Vertical binocular disparity is encoded implicitly within a model neuronal population tuned to horizontal disparity and orientation.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.