Literature DB >> 24492596

Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Johannes Burge1, Wilson S Geisler.   

Abstract

A great challenge of systems neuroscience is to understand the computations that underlie perceptual constancies, the ability to represent behaviorally relevant stimulus properties as constant even when irrelevant stimulus properties vary. As signals proceed through the visual system, neural states become more selective for properties of the environment, and more invariant to irrelevant features of the retinal images. Here, we describe a method for determining the computations that perform these transformations optimally, and apply it to the specific computational task of estimating a powerful depth cue: binocular disparity. We simultaneously determine the optimal receptive field population for encoding natural stereo images of locally planar surfaces and the optimal nonlinear units for decoding the population responses into estimates of disparity. The optimal processing predicts well-established properties of neurons in cortex. Estimation performance parallels important aspects of human performance. Thus, by analyzing the photoreceptor responses to natural images, we provide a normative account of the neurophysiology and psychophysics of absolute disparity processing. Critically, the optimal processing rules are not arbitrarily chosen to match the properties of neurophysiological processing, nor are they fit to match behavioral performance. Rather, they are dictated by the task-relevant statistical properties of complex natural stimuli. Our approach reveals how selective invariant tuning-especially for properties not trivially available in the retinal images-could be implemented in neural systems to maximize performance in particular tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian statistics; complex cells; decoding; depth perception; disparity energy model; encoding; hierarchical model; ideal observer; invariance; natural scene statistics; perceptual constancy; population code; selectivity; simple cells; stereopsis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24492596      PMCID: PMC3912897          DOI: 10.1167/14.2.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  65 in total

1.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10-22       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Binocular energy responses to natural images.

Authors:  Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.

Authors:  L K Cormack; S B Stevenson; C M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; W S Geisler
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Fine-scale processing in human binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  J M Harris; S P McKee; H S Smallman
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity.

Authors:  G F Poggio; F Gonzalez; F Krause
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stereopsis without binocular correlation.

Authors:  M Kaye
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Receptive fields of disparity-tuned simple cells in macaque V1.

Authors:  Doris Y Tsao; Bevil R Conway; Margaret S Livingstone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  33 in total

1.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.

Authors:  Tushar Chauhan; Timothée Masquelier; Alexandre Montlibert; Benoit R Cottereau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Predicting the Partition of Behavioral Variability in Speed Perception with Naturalistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Benjamin M Chin; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Victor Rodriguez-Lopez; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The statistics of how natural images drive the responses of neurons.

Authors:  Arvind Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Disparity Sensitivity and Binocular Integration in Mouse Visual Cortex Areas.

Authors:  Alessandro La Chioma; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Linking normative models of natural tasks to descriptive models of neural response.

Authors:  Priyank Jaini; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Object shape and surface properties are jointly encoded in mid-level ventral visual cortex.

Authors:  Anitha Pasupathy; Taekjun Kim; Dina V Popovkina
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Binocular vision supports the development of scene segmentation capabilities: Evidence from a deep learning model.

Authors:  Ross Goutcher; Christian Barrington; Paul B Hibbard; Bruce Graham
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.