Literature DB >> 14988292

Accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer and the continuous glucose monitoring system during hypoglycemia: experience of the Diabetes Research in Children Network.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the accuracy of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer (GW2B) and the continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) during hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During a 24-h clinical research center stay, 91 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (aged 3.5-17.7 years) wore one or two CGMSs, and 89 of these subjects wore one or two GW2Bs. Frequent serum glucose determinations were made during the day, overnight, and during insulin-induced hypoglycemia resulting in 192 GW2B reference pairs and 401 CGMS reference pairs during hypoglycemia (reference glucose < or =60 mg/dl).
RESULTS: During hypoglycemia, the median absolute difference between the 192 GW2B reference glucose pairs was 26 mg/dl and between the 401 CGMS reference glucose pairs was 19 mg/dl with 31 and 42%, respectively, of the sensor values within 15 mg/dl of the reference glucose. Sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia when the GW2B alarm level was set to 60 mg/dl was 23% with a false-alarm rate of 51%. Analyses suggested that modified CGMS sensors that became available in November 2002 might be more accurate than the original CGMS sensors (median absolute difference 15 vs. 20 mg/dl).
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the GW2B and the CGMS do not reliably detect hypoglycemia. Both of these devices perform better at higher glucose levels, suggesting they may be more useful in reducing HbA1c levels than in detecting hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14988292      PMCID: PMC2365475          DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.3.722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  20 in total

1.  Fear of hypoglycemia in the parents of children and adolescents with diabetes: maladaptive or healthy response?

Authors:  D G Marrero; J C Guare; J L Vandagriff; N S Fineberg
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Francine Ratner Kaufman; Juliana Austin; Aaron Neinstein; Lily Jeng; Mary Halvorson; Debra J Devoe; Pisit Pitukcheewanont
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  The effect of hypoglycemic seizures on cognitive function in children with diabetes: a 7-year prospective study.

Authors:  J F Rovet; R M Ehrlich
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Correlation of fingerstick blood glucose measurements with GlucoWatch biographer glucose results in young subjects with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S K Garg; R O Potts; N R Ackerman; S J Fermi; J A Tamada; H P Chase
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Detection of hypoglycemia with the GlucoWatch biographer.

Authors:  K R Pitzer; S Desai; T Dunn; S Edelman; Y Jayalakshmi; J Kennedy; J A Tamada; R O Potts
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Hypoglycemia prevalence in prepubertal children with type 1 diabetes on standard insulin regimen: use of continuous glucose monitoring system.

Authors:  Rakesh Amin; Karen Ross; Carlo L Acerini; Julie A Edge; Justin Warner; David B Dunger
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Clinical performance of CGMS in type 1 diabetic patients treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion using insulin analogs.

Authors:  Bruno Guerci; Michèle Floriot; Philip Böhme; Danielle Durain; Muriel Benichou; Stéphanie Jellimann; Pierre Drouin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  The accuracy of the CGMS in children with type 1 diabetes: results of the diabetes research in children network (DirecNet) accuracy study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data from non-diabetic and diabetic children: a tale of two algorithms.

Authors:  Stuart A Weinzimer; Maria C DeLucia; Elizabeth A Boland; Amy Steffen; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Spurious reporting of nocturnal hypoglycemia by CGMS in patients with tightly controlled type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Kilty McGowan; William Thomas; Antoinette Moran
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Technologies for continuous glucose monitoring: current problems and future promises.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Diane J Burgess; Ioannis Tomazos; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

2.  Limitations of statistical measures of error in assessing the accuracy of continuous glucose sensors.

Authors:  Craig Kollman; Darrell M Wilson; Tim Wysocki; William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Response to nocturnal alarms using a real-time glucose sensor.

Authors:  Bruce Buckingham; Jen Block; Jonathan Burdick; Andrea Kalajian; Craig Kollman; Michael Choy; Darrell M Wilson; Peter Chase
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Youth and parent satisfaction with clinical use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in the management of pediatric type 1 diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 5.  Enzymatic biosensors.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Newman; Steven J Setford
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 6.  Hypo- and Hyperglycemic Alarms: Devices and Algorithms.

Authors:  Daniel Howsmon; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 7.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Carbon nanotube composites for glucose biosensor incorporated with reverse iontophoresis function for noninvasive glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Tai-Ping Sun; Hsiu-Li Shieh; Congo Tak-Shing Ching; Yan-Dong Yao; Su-Hua Huang; Chia-Ming Liu; Wei-Hao Liu; Chung-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-05-13

9.  Statistical hypoglycemia prediction.

Authors:  Fraser Cameron; Günter Niemeyer; Karen Gundy-Burlet; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-07

10.  Lack of accuracy of continuous glucose sensors in healthy, nondiabetic children: results of the Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) accuracy study.

Authors:  Nelly Mauras; Roy W Beck; Katrina J Ruedy; Craig Kollman; William V Tamborlane; H Peter Chase; Bruce A Buckingham; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Andrea D Booth; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.