Literature DB >> 14685803

Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Michael E R Nicholls1, Georgina Hughes, Jason B Mattingley, John L Bradshaw.   

Abstract

In contrast to unilateral neglect patients, who overattend to the right hemispace, normal participants attend more to the left: a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. Two experiments examined whether pseudoneglect results from object- or space-based attentional biases. Normal participants ( n=38, 22) made luminance judgments for two left/right mirror-reversed luminance gradients (greyscales task). The relative lateral position of the greyscales stimuli was manipulated so that object- and space-based coordinates were congruent or incongruent. A baseline condition was also included. A leftward bias, found for the baseline condition, was annulled in the incongruent condition, demonstrating an opposition of object- and space-based biases. The leftward bias was reduced in the congruent condition where object- and space-based biases were expected to be additive. This effect was attributed to extraneous factors, which were avoided in the second experiment by presenting the greyscales stimuli sequentially. Once again, no bias was observed in the incongruent condition where object- and space-based biases were opposed. The leftward bias in the congruent condition was the same as the baseline. The results can be explained by a combination of space- and object-based biases or by space-based biases alone and are discussed with reference to a variety of models, which describe the distribution of attention across space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685803     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1688-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Frames of reference in unilateral neglect and visual perception: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Michael C Mozer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Right hemispheric dominance for mediating cerebral activation.

Authors:  K M Heilman; T Van Den Abell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  P Nichelli; M Rinaldi; R Cubelli
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  A PET study of visuospatial attention.

Authors:  M Corbetta; F M Miezin; G L Shulman; S E Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

Authors:  M E Nicholls; J L Bradshaw; J B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.

Authors:  Jason Proksch; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect.

Authors:  M Arguin; D N Bub
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Trunk- and head-centred spatial coordinates do not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw; Phillip W Krins
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect.

Authors:  E De Renzi; M Gentilini; P Faglioni; C Barbieri
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  9 in total

1.  Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion.

Authors:  Elisha K Josev; Jason D Forte; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-25

2.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Configurational asymmetry in vernier offset detection.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Haruyuki Kojima
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-10-06

7.  Prism adaptation does not change the rightward spatial preference bias found with ambiguous stimuli in unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Margarita Sarri; Richard Greenwood; Lalit Kalra; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Lighting direction and visual field modulate perceived intensity of illumination.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Barbara Blakeslee; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

9.  Behavioural asymmetries on the greyscales task: The influence of native reading direction.

Authors:  Trista E Friedrich; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Cult Brain       Date:  2014-10-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.