Literature DB >> 10199644

Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

M E Nicholls1, J L Bradshaw, J B Mattingley.   

Abstract

Perceptual asymmetries under free-viewing conditions were investigated in 24 normal dextral adults. Three tasks were administered that required participants to chose between a pair of left/right reversed stimuli on the basis of their brightness, numerosity or size. These stimulus features were represented asymmetrically within the stimuli, so that each stimulus appeared darker, larger or more numerous on the left or right sides. Participants more often selected the stimulus with the relevant feature on the left-hand side for all three tasks. Response times for leftward responses were faster than rightward responses. Split-half reliabilities revealed a high level of consistency within the tasks. However, the correlation between tasks was low. These results suggest that the different tasks, while showing similar levels of perceptual asymmetry, engage distinct sets of lateralised processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10199644     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00074-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  60 in total

1.  Electroencephalographic evidence of vector inversion in antipointing.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Jon Bell; Clay B Holroyd; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines.

Authors:  Pom Charras; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-19

5.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Anika Maraj; Ashlee Gradkowski; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Line bisection by eye and by hand reveal opposite biases.

Authors:  Ute Leonards; Samantha Stone; Christine Mohr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Pseudoneglect for mental alphabet lines is affected by prismatic adaptation.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Adrian Kamer; Andrea M Loftus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.

Authors:  Kao Yamaoka; Chikashi Michimata
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-08-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.