Literature DB >> 15827740

The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Catherine A Orr1, Michael E R Nicholls.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the contribution of space- and object-based coordinates to previously reported leftward perceptual biases (pseudoneglect) at various locations across visual space. Neurologically intact participants (n = 34 and 27) made luminance discriminations between two left/right mirror-reversed luminance gradients (greyscales task), which were variously displaced around the midline in the participants' left and right hemispaces. The orientations of the stimuli were manipulated so that object- and space-based coordinates were congruent or incongruent. Experiment 1 confirmed the presence of a leftward object-based perceptual bias. The bias was moderated, however, by overattention to the more central stimulus. This central spatial effect could have resulted from the use of task-specific strategies, which were controlled by presenting the stimuli sequentially in Experiment 2. The findings of Experiment 1, a leftward object-based bias and a central spatial bias, were replicated. Overall, the results indicate a leftward object-based bias and a central spatial bias, both of which are relevant for the allocation of attention. The results are discussed with reference to a variety of models of the distribution of attention across space.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15827740     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2196-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  48 in total

1.  Can free-viewing perceptual asymmetries be explained by scanning, pre-motor or attentional biases?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina R Roberts
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 2.  Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.422

3.  Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; K S Frieder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Hemispace-visual field interactions in visual extinction.

Authors:  S Z Rapcsak; R T Watson; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere.

Authors:  E Bisiach; L Cornacchia; R Sterzi; G Vallar
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man.

Authors:  G Vallar; D Perani
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect.

Authors:  M Arguin; D N Bub
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Implicit associative priming in a patient with left visual neglect.

Authors:  E Làdavas; R Paladini; R Cubelli
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Trunk- and head-centred spatial coordinates do not affect free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw; Phillip W Krins
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect.

Authors:  E De Renzi; M Gentilini; P Faglioni; C Barbieri
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  8 in total

1.  Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; Thomas M VanVleet; Michael A Silver; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Numbers and space: a cognitive illusion?

Authors:  Maria Dolores de Hevia; Luisa Girelli; Giuseppe Vallar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Authors:  Matia Okubo; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  TMS activation of interhemispheric pathways between the posterior parietal cortex and the contralateral motor cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Diane Ruge; Binith Cheeran; Miguel Fernandez Del Olmo; Cristiano Pecchioli; Barbara Marconi; Viviana Versace; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Sara Torriero; Massimiliano Oliveri; Carlo Caltagirone; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Lateralization of social cognition in the domestic chicken (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Jonathan Niall Daisley; Elena Mascalzoni; Orsola Rosa-Salva; Rosa Rugani; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Lighting direction and visual field modulate perceived intensity of illumination.

Authors:  Mark E McCourt; Barbara Blakeslee; Ganesh Padmanabhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Directional and Non-directional Spatial-Numerical Associations across the Lifespan.

Authors:  Manuel Ninaus; Korbinian Moeller; Liane Kaufmann; Martin H Fischer; Hans-Christoph Nuerk; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-23

8.  The anisotropic field of ensemble coding.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Nadia Ruethemann; Gijs Plomp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.