Literature DB >> 16418850

A stimulus-dependent dissociation between the cerebral hemispheres under free-viewing conditions.

Matia Okubo1, Michael E R Nicholls.   

Abstract

Under free-viewing conditions, the leftward stimulus features are frequently overestimated (pseudoneglect). This asymmetry could reflect the operation of: (a) spatial attention mechanisms in the right hemisphere (RH) or, (b) stimulus-specific activation. To test these propositions, we attempted to induce a stimulus-specific dissociation between the hemispheres under free-viewing conditions. In two experiments (n=23, n=22) dextrals carried out two tasks. The 'grayscales' task required luminance judgments between two mirror-reversed luminance gradients. The flicker task required temporal frequency judgments between two mirror-reversed temporal gradients. The grayscales and flicker tasks suited the processing styles of the right and left hemispheres, respectively. For both experiments, a strong leftward bias was observed for the grayscales task, which could be the result of both of the mechanisms outlined above. In Experiment 1, there was a rightward bias for the flicker task-but only for participants with longer reaction times. In Experiment 2, where all responses were delayed, a rightward bias was found for the flicker task for shorter stimuli. The data demonstrate that stimulus-specific dissociations can be induced under free-viewing conditions. However, the fact that the rightward bias was: (a) weaker than the leftward bias and, (b) reduced by increases in length, demonstrates that RH spatial attention mechanisms are also important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16418850     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0303-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Line bisection judgments implicate right parietal cortex and cerebellum as assessed by fMRI.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; N J Shah; P H Weiss; P W Halligan; M Grosse-Ruyken; K Ziemons; K Zilles; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Visual neglect during intracarotid amobarbital testing.

Authors:  P A Spiers; D L Schomer; H W Blume; J Kleefield; G O'Reilly; S Weintraub; P Osborne-Shaefer; M M Mesulam
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli.

Authors:  K E Luh; L M Rueckert; J Levy
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays.

Authors:  D G Pelli; L Zhang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Hemispheric functional asymmetry in visual discrimination between univariate stimuli: an analysis of sensitivity and response criterion.

Authors:  Paolo Nichelli; Hans Spinnler; Edoardo Bisiach
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 8.  On spatial frequencies and cerebral hemispheres: some remarks from the electrophysiological and neuropsychological points of view.

Authors:  L Mecacci
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  Free-viewing perceptual asymmetries for the judgement of brightness, numerosity and size.

Authors:  M E Nicholls; J L Bradshaw; J B Mattingley
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis.

Authors:  S Ben Hamed; J R Duhamel; F Bremmer; W Graf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intra- and Inter-Task Reliability of Spatial Attention Measures in Pseudoneglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Aodhan Gallagher; Jamie Gibson; Gregor Thut; Monika Harvey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Beyond the Sensorimotor Plasticity: Cognitive Expansion of Prism Adaptation in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Carine Michel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.