Literature DB >> 25872177

Spatial distortions in localization and midline estimation in hemianopia and normal vision.

Francesca C Fortenbaugh1, Thomas M VanVleet2, Michael A Silver3, Lynn C Robertson4.   

Abstract

Studies have shown that individuals with hemianopia tend to bisect a line toward their blind, contralesional visual field, termed the hemianopic line bisection error (HLBE). One theory proposes that the HLBE is a perceptual distortion resulting from expansion of the central region of visual space. If true, perceptual expansions of the central regions in the intact hemifield should also be present and observable across different tasks. We tested this hypothesis using a peripheral localization task to assess localization and midpoint estimation along the horizontal axis of the visual field. In this task, participants judged the location of a target dot presented inside a Goldmann perimeter relative to their perceived visual field boundary. In Experiment 1, we tested neurologically healthy participants on the peripheral localization task as well as a novel midpoint assessment task in which participants reported their perceived midpoint along the horizontal axis of their left and right visual fields. The results revealed consistency in individual biases across the two tasks. We then used the peripheral localization task to test whether two patients with hemianopia showed a selective expansion of central visual space. For these patients, three axes were tested: the spared temporal horizontal axis and the upper and lower vertical axes. The results support the notion that the HLBE is due to expansion of perceived space along the spared temporal axis. Together, the results of both experiments validate the use of these novel paradigms for exploring perceptual asymmetries in both healthy individuals and patients with visual field loss. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bisection; Hemianopia; Hemianopic Line Bisection Error; Peripheral localization; Pseudoneglect; Space perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25872177      PMCID: PMC4442712          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  60 in total

1.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.

Authors:  G Jewell; M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Effects of visible and invisible cueing procedures on perceptual judgments in young and elderly subjects.

Authors:  M Harvey; T D Pool; M J Roberson; B Olk
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Contrasts and correlations in effect-size estimation.

Authors:  R L Rosnow; R Rosenthal; D B Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

4.  Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.

Authors:  M E McCourt
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.

Authors:  J R Crawford; Paul H Garthwaite
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Multiple perceptual distortions and their modulation in leftsided visual neglect.

Authors:  G Kerkhoff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Filling-in of retinal scotomas.

Authors:  Dror Zur; Shimon Ullman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability.

Authors:  D C Van Essen; W T Newsome; J H Maunsell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Eccentricity perception in the periphery of normal observers and those with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  L A Temme; J H Maino; W K Noell
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-11

10.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  The Effects of Hemianopia on Perception of Mutual Gaze.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers; Sarah Sheldon; Heiko Hecht
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Angelica Maria Tinga; Johanna Maria Augusta Visser-Meily; Maarten Jeroen van der Smagt; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Raymond van Ee; Tanja Cornelia Wilhelmina Nijboer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 7.444

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.