Literature DB >> 8348832

Evidence for an independent stimulus-centered spatial reference frame from a case of visual hemineglect.

M Arguin1, D N Bub.   

Abstract

Previous experiments with patients suffering from visual hemineglect have provided evidence relevant to the organization of the human spatial representation system. We examined the hypothesis that one reference frame used to represent the location of objects in the environment is based on the spatial extent of the stimulation that needs to be processed at a specific point in time; in current terminology, a stimulus-centered reference frame. The paradigm used was one of filtering, and variation of the location of the target within a horizontal array of items (stimulus-relative location) was independent of the target location relative to the subject and to stable reference points in the environment. Results showed that stimulus-relative target location provided an independent contribution to the magnitude of the neglect symptoms. This is taken as an indication that a stimulus-centered spatial reference frame contributes to the representation of the location of visual objects in human vision and that this representation may serve to direct visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8348832     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80188-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  13 in total

1.  The interaction of spatial reference frames and hierarchical object representations: evidence from figure copying in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  M Behrmann; D C Plaut
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Right hemispatial neglect: frequency and characterization following acute left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Jonathan T Kleinman; Melissa Newhart; Cameron Davis; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Rebecca F Gottesman; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Stimulus-specific competitive selection in macaque extrastriate visual area V4.

Authors:  Mazyar Fallah; Gene R Stoner; John H Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect.

Authors:  N Beschin; R Cubelli; S Della Sala; L Spinazzola
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  André Dufour; Pascale Touzalin; Victor Candas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A new view of hemineglect based on the response properties of parietal neurones.

Authors:  A Pouget; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Diverse spatial reference frames of vestibular signals in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Xiaodong Chen; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.