Literature DB >> 12167254

Changes in the spatial distribution of visual attention after early deafness.

Jason Proksch1, Daphne Bavelier.   

Abstract

There is much anecdotal suggestion of improved visual skills in congenitally deaf individuals. However, this claim has only been met by mixed results from careful investigations of visual skills in deaf individuals. Psychophysical assessments of visual functions have failed, for the most part, to validate the view of enhanced visual skills after deafness. Only a few studies have shown an advantage for deaf individuals in visual tasks. Interestingly, all of these studies share the requirement that participants process visual information in their peripheral visual field under demanding conditions of attention. This work has led us to propose that congenital auditory deprivation alters the gradient of visual attention from central to peripheral field by enhancing peripheral processing. This hypothesis was tested by adapting a search task from Lavie and colleagues in which the interference from distracting information on the search task provides a measure of attentional resources. These authors have established that during an easy central search for a target, any surplus attention remaining will involuntarily process a peripheral distractor that the subject has been instructed to ignore. Attentional resources can be measured by adjusting the difficulty of the search task to the point at which no surplus resources are available for the distractor. Through modification of this paradigm, central and peripheral attentional resources were compared in deaf and hearing individuals. Deaf individuals possessed greater attentional resources in the periphery but less in the center when compared to hearing individuals. Furthermore, based on results from native hearing signers, it was shown that sign language alone could not be responsible for these changes. We conclude that auditory deprivation from birth leads to compensatory changes within the visual system that enhance attentional processing of the peripheral visual field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12167254     DOI: 10.1162/08989290260138591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  79 in total

1.  Absence of cross-modal reorganization in the primary auditory cortex of congenitally deaf cats.

Authors:  A Kral; J-H Schröder; R Klinke; A K Engel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bilingualism and attention: a study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; H Julia Hannay; Arturo E Hernandez
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Spatial gradients of oculomotor inhibition of return in deaf and normal adults.

Authors:  Srikant Jayaraman; Raymond M Klein; Matthew D Hilchey; Gouri Shanker Patil; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-10

5.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries.

Authors:  Catherine A Orr; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Classroom Interpreting and Visual Information Processing in Mainstream Education for Deaf Students: Live or Memorex?

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Jeff B Pelz; Carol Convertino; Patricia Sapere; Mary Ellen Arndt; Rosemarie Seewagen
Journal:  Am Educ Res J       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Visual skills and cross-modal plasticity in deaf readers: possible implications for acquiring meaning from print.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Peter C Hauser; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Are object- and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries?

Authors:  Michael E R Nicholls; Georgina Hughes; Jason B Mattingley; John L Bradshaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Development of visual attention skills in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants.

Authors:  D L Horn; R A O Davis; D B Pisoni; R T Miyamoto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Executive Function in Deaf Children: Auditory Access and Language Access.

Authors:  Matthew L Hall; Inge-Marie Eigsti; Heather Bortfeld; Diane Lillo-Martin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.