Literature DB >> 14674729

Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.

Phil Reed1, Peter Howell, Stevie Sackin, Lisa Pizzimenti, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

The voiceless affricate/fricative contrast has played an important role in developing auditory theories of speech perception. This type of theory draws some of its support from experimental data on animals. However, nothing is known about differential responding of affricate/fricative continua by animals. In the current study, the ability of hooded rats to "label" an affricate/fricative continuum was tested. Transfer (without retraining) to analogous nonspeech continua was also tested. The nonspeech continua were chosen so that if transfer occurred, it would indicate whether the animals had learned to use rise time or duration cues to differentiate affricates from fricatives. The data from 9 of 10 rats indicated that rats can discriminate between these cues and do so in a similar manner to human subjects. The data from 9 of 10 rats also demonstrated that the rise time of the stimulus was the basis of the discrimination; the remaining rat appeared to use duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674729      PMCID: PMC1284954          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  Motor activation from visible speech: evidence from stimulus response compatibility.

Authors:  D Kerzel; H Bekkering
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J D Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Auditory sensitivity of the albino rat.

Authors:  J B Kelly; B Masterton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1977-08

Review 4.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Production and perception of rise time in the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction.

Authors:  P Howell; S Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

7.  Plucks and bows are not categorically perceived.

Authors:  S M Rosen; P Howell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-08

8.  A multidimensional scaling analysis of vowel discrimination in humans and monkeys.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; C H Brown; W T Malik; R A Kressley
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

9.  Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica).

Authors:  A J Lotto; K R Kluender; L L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Japanese quail can learn phonetic categories.

Authors:  K R Kluender; R L Diehl; P R Killeen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  13 in total

1.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.

Authors:  K G Ranasinghe; W A Vrana; C J Matney; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

Authors:  Owen R Floody; Ladislav Ouda; Benjamin A Porter; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-05-24

5.  Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions.

Authors:  Benjamin A Porter; Tara R Rosenthal; Kamalini G Ranasinghe; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Cortical activity patterns predict robust speech discrimination ability in noise.

Authors:  Jai A Shetake; Jordan T Wolf; Ryan J Cheung; Crystal T Engineer; Satyananda K Ram; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Speech training alters tone frequency tuning in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; Ryan S Carraway; Kevin Q Chang; Jarod L Roland; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Shank3-deficient rats exhibit degraded cortical responses to sound.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Michael S Borland; Elizabeth P Buell; Kwok W Im; Linda G Wilson; Pryanka Sharma; Sven Vanneste; Hala Harony-Nicolas; Joseph D Buxbaum; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.216

9.  Behavioral and neural discrimination of speech sounds after moderate or intense noise exposure in rats.

Authors:  Amanda C Reed; Tracy M Centanni; Michael S Borland; Chanel J Matney; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Rule learning over consonants and vowels in a non-human animal.

Authors:  Daniela M de la Mora; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.