Literature DB >> 6841824

Production and perception of rise time in the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction.

P Howell, S Rosen.   

Abstract

Rise times of voiceless affricates and fricatives were measured when the test material occurred in sentences, in isolated words, and in isolated nonsense syllables. As has been reported previously the rise times of affricates were significantly shorter than those of fricatives. Rise times varied with the type of test material and for all types of material were significantly longer than those reported by L.J. Gerstman [unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University (1957)]. Differences in the way the previous measurements were made do not appear to explain the discrepancy. Because rise time varies with type of test material, no auditory sensitivity at a single rise time value can be responsible for the perceptual distinction between voiceless affricates and fricatives. This conclusion was also supported by the results of a perceptual experiment in which listeners were asked to label speech or nonspeech stimuli drawn from a continuum varying in rise time. Substantially different estimates of the category boundary were obtained when the range of rise times covered by the stimuli differed.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841824     DOI: 10.1121/1.389023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Amplitude rise time and the perception of the voiceless affricate/fricative distinction.

Authors:  K R Kluender; M A Walsh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

Review 3.  New perspectives on assessing amplification effects.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-09

4.  Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

6.  Prediction of P-center location from the distribution of energy in the amplitude envelope: I.

Authors:  P Howell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

7.  Alveolar and Postalveolar Voiceless Fricative and Affricate Productions of Spanish-English Bilingual Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Fangfang Li; Ferenc Bunta; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Individual sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues in listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza; Richard A Wright; Michael C Blackburn; Rachael Tatman; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Sinusoidal plucks and bows are not categorically perceived, either.

Authors:  S Rosen; P Howell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-09

10.  Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Peter Howell; Stevie Sackin; Lisa Pizzimenti; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.