Literature DB >> 24344364

Speech training alters tone frequency tuning in rat primary auditory cortex.

Crystal T Engineer, Claudia A Perez, Ryan S Carraway, Kevin Q Chang, Jarod L Roland, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

Previous studies in both humans and animals have documented improved performance following discrimination training. This enhanced performance is often associated with cortical response changes. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that long-term speech training on multiple tasks can improve primary auditory cortex (A1) responses compared to rats trained on a single speech discrimination task or experimentally naïve rats. Specifically, we compared the percent of A1 responding to trained sounds, the responses to both trained and untrained sounds, receptive field properties of A1 neurons, and the neural discrimination of pairs of speech sounds in speech trained and naïve rats. Speech training led to accurate discrimination of consonant and vowel sounds, but did not enhance A1 response strength or the neural discrimination of these sounds. Speech training altered tone responses in rats trained on six speech discrimination tasks but not in rats trained on a single speech discrimination task. Extensive speech training resulted in broader frequency tuning, shorter onset latencies, a decreased driven response to tones, and caused a shift in the frequency map to favor tones in the range where speech sounds are the loudest. Both the number of trained tasks and the number of days of training strongly predict the percent of A1 responding to a low frequency tone. Rats trained on a single speech discrimination task performed less accurately than rats trained on multiple tasks and did not exhibit A1 response changes. Our results indicate that extensive speech training can reorganize the A1 frequency map, which may have downstream consequences on speech sound processing.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24344364      PMCID: PMC3886187          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training.

Authors:  K Tremblay; N Kraus; T McGee; C Ponton; B Otis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Persistent and specific influences of early acoustic environments on primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  L I Zhang; S Bao; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Flutter discrimination: neural codes, perception, memory and decision making.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast.

Authors:  Daniel E Callan; Keiichi Tajima; Akiko M Callan; Rieko Kubo; Shinobu Masaki; Reiko Akahane-Yamada
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization.

Authors:  David J Freedman; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Tomaso Poggio; Earl K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Harnessing plasticity to understand learning and treat disease.

Authors:  Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Speech perception in rats: use of duration and rise time cues in labeling of affricate/fricative sounds.

Authors:  Phil Reed; Peter Howell; Stevie Sackin; Lisa Pizzimenti; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  12 in total

1.  Perceptual Training Restores Impaired Cortical Temporal Processing Due to Lead Exposure.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhu; Xia Liu; Fanfan Wei; Fang Wang; Michael M Merzenich; Christoph E Schreiner; Xinde Sun; Xiaoming Zhou
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Degraded auditory processing in a rat model of autism limits the speech representation in non-primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  C T Engineer; T M Centanni; K W Im; M S Borland; N A Moreno; R S Carraway; L G Wilson; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.964

3.  Immersive audiomotor game play enhances neural and perceptual salience of weak signals in noise.

Authors:  Jonathon P Whitton; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Degraded speech sound processing in a rat model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Tracy M Centanni; Kwok W Im; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Pairing Speech Sounds With Vagus Nerve Stimulation Drives Stimulus-specific Cortical Plasticity.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Navzer D Engineer; Jonathan R Riley; Jonathan D Seale; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Pairing vagus nerve stimulation with tones drives plasticity across the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Michael S Borland; Will A Vrana; Nicole A Moreno; Elizabeth A Fogarty; Elizabeth P Buell; Sven Vanneste; Michael P Kilgard; Crystal T Engineer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Degraded neural and behavioral processing of speech sounds in a rat model of Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Michael S Borland; Elizabeth P Buell; Tracy M Centanni; Melyssa K Fink; Kwok W Im; Linda G Wilson; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.996

9.  Behavioral and neural discrimination of speech sounds after moderate or intense noise exposure in rats.

Authors:  Amanda C Reed; Tracy M Centanni; Michael S Borland; Chanel J Matney; Crystal T Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  How learning to abstract shapes neural sound representations.

Authors:  Anke Ley; Jean Vroomen; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.