Literature DB >> 20580729

Effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats.

Owen R Floody1, Ladislav Ouda, Benjamin A Porter, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

The intensity of a noise-induced startle response can be reduced by the presentation of an otherwise neutral stimulus immediately before the noise ("prepulse inhibition" or PPI). We used a form of PPI to study the effects of damage to auditory cortex on the discrimination of speech sounds by rats. Subjects underwent control surgery or treatment of the auditory cortex with the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1. This treatment caused damage concentrated in primary auditory cortex (A1). Both before and after lesions, subjects were tested on 5 tasks, most presenting a pair of human speech sounds (consonant-vowel syllables) so that the capacity for discrimination would be evident in the extent of PPI. Group comparisons failed to reveal any consistent lesion effect. At the same time, the analysis of individual differences in performance by multiple regression suggests that some of the temporal processing required to discriminate speech sounds is concentrated anteroventrally in the right A1. These results also confirm that PPI can be adapted to studies of the brain mechanisms involved in the processing of speech and other complex sounds. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20580729      PMCID: PMC2910791          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  47 in total

1.  Impaired processing of complex auditory stimuli in rats with induced cerebrocortical microgyria: An animal model of developmental language disabilities.

Authors:  M G Clark; G D Rosen; P Tallal; R H Fitch
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Between sound and perception: reviewing the search for a neural code.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Imaging studies on sex differences in the lateralization of language.

Authors:  K Kansaku; S Kitazawa
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Asymmetry of voice onset time-processing in adult developmental dyslexics.

Authors:  K Giraud; A Trébuchon-DaFonseca; J F Démonet; M Habib; C Liégeois-Chauvel
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Functional specificity in the right human auditory cortex for perceiving pitch direction.

Authors:  I S Johnsrude; V B Penhune; R J Zatorre
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Redefining the tonotopic core of rat auditory cortex: physiological evidence for a posterior field.

Authors:  Neot N Doron; Joseph E Ledoux; Malcolm N Semple
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2002-11-25       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  The use of prosodic cues in language discrimination tasks by rats.

Authors:  Juan M Toro; Josep B Trobalon; Núria Sebastián-Gallés
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Auditory cortex lesions in the rat impair both temporal acuity and noise increment thresholds, revealing a common neural substrate.

Authors:  G Peter Bowen; Daniel Lin; Merritt K Taylor; James R Ison
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Use of a modified prepulse inhibition paradigm to assess complex auditory discrimination in rodents.

Authors:  R Holly Fitch; Steven W Threlkeld; Melissa M McClure; Ann M Peiffer
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 4.077

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reorganization in processing of spectral and temporal input in the rat posterior auditory field induced by environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Auditory cortex lesions do not disrupt habituation of HPA axis responses to repeated noise stress.

Authors:  Cher V Masini; Jessica A Babb; Tara J Nyhuis; Heidi E W Day; Serge Campeau
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  An acoustic startle-based method of assessing frequency discrimination in mice.

Authors:  Amanda Clause; Tuan Nguyen; Karl Kandler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions.

Authors:  Benjamin A Porter; Tara R Rosenthal; Kamalini G Ranasinghe; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Knockdown of the dyslexia-associated gene Kiaa0319 impairs temporal responses to speech stimuli in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A B Booker; A M Sloan; F Chen; B J Maher; R S Carraway; N Khodaparast; R Rennaker; J J LoTurco; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  What can we learn from inactivation studies? Lessons from auditory cortex.

Authors:  Zuzanna A Slonina; Katarina C Poole; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Similarity of cortical activity patterns predicts generalization behavior.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; Ryan S Carraway; Kevin Q Chang; Jarod L Roland; Andrew M Sloan; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dependence of the Startle Response on Temporal and Spectral Characteristics of Acoustic Modulatory Influences in Rats and Gerbils.

Authors:  Natalie Steube; Manuela Nowotny; Peter K D Pilz; Bernhard H Gaese
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.558

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.