Literature DB >> 21167211

Discrimination of brief speech sounds is impaired in rats with auditory cortex lesions.

Benjamin A Porter1, Tara R Rosenthal, Kamalini G Ranasinghe, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

Auditory cortex (AC) lesions impair complex sound discrimination. However, a recent study demonstrated spared performance on an acoustic startle response test of speech discrimination following AC lesions (Floody et al., 2010). The current study reports the effects of AC lesions on two operant speech discrimination tasks. AC lesions caused a modest and quickly recovered impairment in the ability of rats to discriminate consonant-vowel-consonant speech sounds. This result seems to suggest that AC does not play a role in speech discrimination. However, the speech sounds used in both studies differed in many acoustic dimensions and an adaptive change in discrimination strategy could allow the rats to use an acoustic difference that does not require an intact AC to discriminate. Based on our earlier observation that the first 40 ms of the spatiotemporal activity patterns elicited by speech sounds best correlate with behavioral discriminations of these sounds (Engineer et al., 2008), we predicted that eliminating additional cues by truncating speech sounds to the first 40 ms would render the stimuli indistinguishable to a rat with AC lesions. Although the initial discrimination of truncated sounds took longer to learn, the final performance paralleled rats using full-length consonant-vowel-consonant sounds. After 20 days of testing, half of the rats using speech onsets received bilateral AC lesions. Lesions severely impaired speech onset discrimination for at least one-month post lesion. These results support the hypothesis that auditory cortex is required to accurately discriminate the subtle differences between similar consonant and vowel sounds.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21167211      PMCID: PMC3062672          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  46 in total

1.  Speech perception by the chinchilla: voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants.

Authors:  P K Kuhl; J D Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Effect of auditory neocortex ablation on identification of click rates in cats.

Authors:  J L Cranford; M Igarashi; J H Stramler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-10-29       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Discrimination in neonates of very short CVs.

Authors:  J Bertoncini; R Bijeljac-Babic; S E Blumstein; J Mehler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of auditory cortex ablation on localization and discrimination of brief sounds.

Authors:  H Heffner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments.

Authors:  S E Blumstein; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory cortex and the pitch of complex tones.

Authors:  I C Whitfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Role of the auditory cortex in recognition of synthesized vowels by dogs.

Authors:  A V Baru; G N Shmigidina
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1977 Jul-Sep

8.  Effect of unilateral and bilateral auditory cortex lesions on the discrimination of vocalizations by Japanese macaques.

Authors:  H E Heffner; R S Heffner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cortical deafness cannot account for the inability of Japanese macaques to discriminate species-specific vocalizations.

Authors:  H E Heffner; R S Heffner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Behavioral and neurochemical asymmetries following unilateral trephination of the rat skull: is this control operation always appropriate?

Authors:  F S Adams; R K Schwarting; J P Huston
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-05
View more
  22 in total

1.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Behavioral detection of passive whisker stimuli requires somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Toshio Miyashita; Daniel E Feldman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Adaptive categorization of sound frequency does not require the auditory cortex in rats.

Authors:  Tyler L Gimenez; Maja Lorenc; Santiago Jaramillo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  State-dependent population coding in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Marius Pachitariu; Dmitry R Lyamzin; Maneesh Sahani; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Degraded auditory processing in a rat model of autism limits the speech representation in non-primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  C T Engineer; T M Centanni; K W Im; M S Borland; N A Moreno; R S Carraway; L G Wilson; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.964

6.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Increasing diversity of neural responses to speech sounds across the central auditory pathway.

Authors:  K G Ranasinghe; W A Vrana; C J Matney; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Knockdown of Dyslexia-Gene Dcdc2 Interferes with Speech Sound Discrimination in Continuous Streams.

Authors:  Tracy Michelle Centanni; Anne B Booker; Fuyi Chen; Andrew M Sloan; Ryan S Carraway; Robert L Rennaker; Joseph J LoTurco; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.