Literature DB >> 25072238

Behavioral and neural discrimination of speech sounds after moderate or intense noise exposure in rats.

Amanda C Reed1, Tracy M Centanni, Michael S Borland, Chanel J Matney, Crystal T Engineer, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss is a commonly experienced disability in a variety of populations including veterans and the elderly and can often cause significant impairment in the ability to understand spoken language. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that neural and behavioral responses to speech will be differentially impaired in an animal model after two forms of hearing loss.
DESIGN: Sixteen female Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to one of two types of broadband noise which was either moderate or intense. In nine of these rats, auditory cortex recordings were taken 4 weeks after noise exposure (NE). The other seven were pretrained on a speech sound discrimination task prior to NE and were then tested on the same task after hearing loss.
RESULTS: Following intense NE, rats had few neural responses to speech stimuli. These rats were able to detect speech sounds but were no longer able to discriminate between speech sounds. Following moderate NE, rats had reorganized cortical maps and altered neural responses to speech stimuli but were still able to accurately discriminate between similar speech sounds during behavioral testing.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that rats are able to adjust to the neural changes after moderate NE and discriminate speech sounds, but they are not able to recover behavioral abilities after intense NE. Animal models could help clarify the adaptive and pathological neural changes that contribute to speech processing in hearing-impaired populations and could be used to test potential behavioral and pharmacological therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25072238      PMCID: PMC4442319          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  72 in total

Review 1.  Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Enriched acoustic environment after noise trauma abolishes neural signs of tinnitus.

Authors:  Arnaud J Noreña; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Effects of noise-induced hearing loss at young age on voice onset time and gap-in-noise representations in adult cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Naotaka Aizawa; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-12

4.  Tinnitus behavior and hearing function correlate with the reciprocal expression patterns of BDNF and Arg3.1/arc in auditory neurons following acoustic trauma.

Authors:  J Tan; L Rüttiger; R Panford-Walsh; W Singer; H Schulze; S B Kilian; S Hadjab; U Zimmermann; I Köpschall; K Rohbock; M Knipper
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Cortical activity patterns predict speech discrimination ability.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Claudia A Perez; YeTing H Chen; Ryan S Carraway; Amanda C Reed; Jai A Shetake; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Kevin Q Chang; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Multiparametric auditory receptive field organization across five cortical fields in the albino rat.

Authors:  Daniel B Polley; Heather L Read; Douglas A Storace; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  From genes to behavior in developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Albert M Galaburda; Joseph LoTurco; Franck Ramus; R Holly Fitch; Glenn D Rosen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Representation of the vowel /epsilon/ in normal and impaired auditory nerve fibers: model predictions of responses in cats.

Authors:  Muhammad S A Zilany; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Gaëtan Gilbert; Héloïse Carn; Stéphane Garnier; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Changes in neuronal activity and gene expression in guinea-pig auditory brainstem after unilateral partial hearing loss.

Authors:  S Dong; W H A M Mulders; J Rodger; D Robertson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  5 in total

1.  Knockdown of Dyslexia-Gene Dcdc2 Interferes with Speech Sound Discrimination in Continuous Streams.

Authors:  Tracy Michelle Centanni; Anne B Booker; Fuyi Chen; Andrew M Sloan; Ryan S Carraway; Robert L Rennaker; Joseph J LoTurco; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Central Gain Restores Auditory Processing following Near-Complete Cochlear Denervation.

Authors:  Anna R Chambers; Jennifer Resnik; Yasheng Yuan; Jonathon P Whitton; Albert S Edge; M Charles Liberman; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Engagement in community music classes sparks neuroplasticity and language development in children from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Authors:  Nina Kraus; Jane Hornickel; Dana L Strait; Jessica Slater; Elaine Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-12-16

4.  Early-life exposure to noise reduces mPFC astrocyte numbers and T-maze alternation/discrimination task performance in adult male rats.

Authors:  Yaveth Ruvalcaba-Delgadillo; Sonia Luquín; Rodrigo Ramos-Zúñiga; Alfredo Feria-Velasco; Rocío Elizabeth González-Castañeda; Maria Isabel Pérez-Vega; Fernando Jáuregui-Huerta; Joaquín García-Estrada
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

5.  Hidden Hearing Loss Impacts the Neural Representation of Speech in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Jose A Garcia-Lazaro; David McAlpine; Roland Schaette
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 10.834

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.