Literature DB >> 22098331

Cortical activity patterns predict robust speech discrimination ability in noise.

Jai A Shetake1, Jordan T Wolf, Ryan J Cheung, Crystal T Engineer, Satyananda K Ram, Michael P Kilgard.   

Abstract

The neural mechanisms that support speech discrimination in noisy conditions are poorly understood. In quiet conditions, spike timing information appears to be used in the discrimination of speech sounds. In this study, we evaluated the hypothesis that spike timing is also used to distinguish between speech sounds in noisy conditions that significantly degrade neural responses to speech sounds. We tested speech sound discrimination in rats and recorded primary auditory cortex (A1) responses to speech sounds in background noise of different intensities and spectral compositions. Our behavioral results indicate that rats, like humans, are able to accurately discriminate consonant sounds even in the presence of background noise that is as loud as the speech signal. Our neural recordings confirm that speech sounds evoke degraded but detectable responses in noise. Finally, we developed a novel neural classifier that mimics behavioral discrimination. The classifier discriminates between speech sounds by comparing the A1 spatiotemporal activity patterns evoked on single trials with the average spatiotemporal patterns evoked by known sounds. Unlike classifiers in most previous studies, this classifier is not provided with the stimulus onset time. Neural activity analyzed with the use of relative spike timing was well correlated with behavioral speech discrimination in quiet and in noise. Spike timing information integrated over longer intervals was required to accurately predict rat behavioral speech discrimination in noisy conditions. The similarity of neural and behavioral discrimination of speech in noise suggests that humans and rats may employ similar brain mechanisms to solve this problem.
© 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22098331      PMCID: PMC3286125          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07887.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  81 in total

1.  Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  State-dependent computations: spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks.

Authors:  Dean V Buonomano; Wolfgang Maass
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Computational role of large receptive fields in the primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Guglielmo Foffani; John K Chapin; Karen A Moxon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing.

Authors:  P Tallal; S Miller; R H Fitch
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-06-14       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Segmentation and speech perception in relation to reading skill: a developmental analysis.

Authors:  M Snowling; N Goulandris; M Bowlby; P Howell
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1986-06

6.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory scene analysis by songbirds: stream segregation of birdsong by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  S H Hulse; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; A B Wisniewski
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

9.  Spatiotemporal activity patterns of rat cortical neurons predict responses in a conditioned task.

Authors:  A E Villa; I V Tetko; B Hyland; A Najem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Information Carried by Population Spike Times in the Whisker Sensory Cortex can be Decoded Without Knowledge of Stimulus Time.

Authors:  Stefano Panzeri; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-14
View more
  34 in total

1.  Different timescales for the neural coding of consonant and vowel sounds.

Authors:  Claudia A Perez; Crystal T Engineer; Vikram Jakkamsetti; Ryan S Carraway; Matthew S Perry; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Cortical inhibition reduces information redundancy at presentation of communication sounds in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Chloé Huetz; Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A modular high-density μECoG system on macaque vlPFC for auditory cognitive decoding.

Authors:  Chia-Han Chiang; Jaejin Lee; Charles Wang; Ashley J Williams; Timothy H Lucas; Yale E Cohen; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Degraded auditory processing in a rat model of autism limits the speech representation in non-primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  C T Engineer; T M Centanni; K W Im; M S Borland; N A Moreno; R S Carraway; L G Wilson; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.964

5.  Environmental acoustic enrichment promotes recovery from developmentally degraded auditory cortical processing.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhu; Fang Wang; Huifang Hu; Xinde Sun; Michael P Kilgard; Michael M Merzenich; Xiaoming Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Speech training alters consonant and vowel responses in multiple auditory cortex fields.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Elizabeth P Buell; Melyssa K Fink; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Inverted-U function relating cortical plasticity and task difficulty.

Authors:  N D Engineer; C T Engineer; A C Reed; P K Pandya; V Jakkamsetti; R Moucha; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Degraded neural and behavioral processing of speech sounds in a rat model of Rett syndrome.

Authors:  Crystal T Engineer; Kimiya C Rahebi; Michael S Borland; Elizabeth P Buell; Tracy M Centanni; Melyssa K Fink; Kwok W Im; Linda G Wilson; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Cortical speech-evoked response patterns in multiple auditory fields are correlated with behavioral discrimination ability.

Authors:  T M Centanni; C T Engineer; M P Kilgard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.