Literature DB >> 14587612

A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Walt Jesteadt1, Lance Nizami, Kim S Schairer.   

Abstract

Internal noise is often inferred from the difference between observed performance and optimum performance in detection and discrimination tasks. It can be measured directly in some cases by observing the extent to which a change in external variability impacts performance. In the studies reported here, external variability was added to an intensity discrimination task by adding a Gaussian random variable with zero mean to the overall level presented in each interval of a two-interval forced-choice task. The standard deviation of the random variable was set to half the mean difference between the levels in the two intervals, resulting in d'(ideal) = 2. As the mean difference and the corresponding standard deviation of the random variable decreased in size, performance was increasingly limited by internal noise, permitting a reliable estimate of internal noise to be obtained. This can be viewed as a sample discrimination task, with one component per sample. In the first study, performance was measured using 2-kHz tones presented at an average level of 70 dB SPL, with mean differences between distributions ranging from 0.1 to 2.2 dB in steps of 0.3 dB. The distributions were either Gaussian in level or in power. Conditions with no external variability were used to obtain a psychometric function. In the second study, performance was measured using 2-kHz tones presented at average levels of 50 and 90 dB SPL, with mean differences ranging from 0.4 to 2.2 dB in steps of 0.6 dB. In both studies, the measure of internal noise was highly reliable and in good agreement with the intensity difference limen (DL) estimated from the psychometric function. Analyses suggest that this measure could be used to estimate the mean difference between the decision distributions as well as the amount of internal noise in cases where the mean difference between the distributions is unknown.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14587612     DOI: 10.1121/1.1610456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Sara M Walker; Oluwaseye A Ogun; Brenda Ohlrich; Katyarina E Brunette; Marcin Wróblewski; Kendra K Schmid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

6.  Development and the role of internal noise in detection and discrimination thresholds with narrow band stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Gap Detection in School-Age Children and Adults: Center Frequency and Ramp Duration.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

9.  Psychometric functions for pure tone intensity discrimination: slope differences in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Signal detection in animal psychoacoustics: analysis and simulation of sensory and decision-related influences.

Authors:  A Alves-Pinto; J Sollini; C J Sumner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.