Literature DB >> 18397028

Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited.

Magdalena Wojtczak1, Neal F Viemeister.   

Abstract

The perceived strength of intensity fluctuations evoked by suprathreshold sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) and the perceived size of intensity increments were compared across levels of a wideband noise and a 1-kHz tone. For the 1-kHz tone, the comparisons were made in quiet and in a high-pass noise. The data indicate that suprathreshold modulation depths and intensity increments, perceived as equivalent across levels, follow a pattern resembling Weber's law for noise and the "near miss" to Weber's law for a tone. The effect of a high-pass noise was largely consistent with that observed for AM and increment detection. The data suggest that Weber's law is not a direct consequence of the dependence of internal noise on stimulus level, as suggested by multiplicative internal noise models. Equal loudness ratios and equal loudness differences (computed using loudness for the stationary portions before and after the increment) accounted for the increment-matching data for noise and for the tone, respectively, but neither measure predicted the results for both types of stimuli. Predictions based on log-transformed excitation patterns and predictions using an equal number of intensity just-noticeable differences were in qualitative, but not quantitative, agreement with the data.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18397028      PMCID: PMC2394195          DOI: 10.1121/1.2839889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  37 in total

1.  Revisiting relations between loudness and intensity discrimination.

Authors:  W S Hellman; R P Hellman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Quantifying the information in auditory-nerve responses for level discrimination.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

3.  A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Lance Nizami; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  NOISE AND WEBER'S LAW: THE DISCRIMINATION OF BRIGHTNESS AND OTHER DIMENSIONS.

Authors:  M TREISMAN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 5.  Neural processing of amplitude-modulated sounds.

Authors:  P X Joris; C E Schreiner; A Rees
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: the effects of filtered noise.

Authors:  N F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pure-tone intensity discrimination and energy detection.

Authors:  W J McGill; J P Goldberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Weber's law, power law, and internal noise.

Authors:  E Eijkman; J M Thijssen; J H Vendrik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Inferred basilar-membrane response functions for listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Vit Drga; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Tomokazu Urakawa; Koya Yamashiro; Naofumi Otsuru; Makoto Nishihara; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Sumru Keceli; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 4.  Review: analysis of parasite and other skewed counts.

Authors:  Neal Alexander
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.622

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.