A J Burghardt1, G J Kazakia, T M Link, S Majumdar. 1. Musculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, QB3 Building, Suite 203, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA. andrew.burghardt@radiology.ucsf.edu
Abstract
SUMMARY: An automated image processing method is presented for simulating areal bone mineral density measures using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in the ultra-distal radius. The accuracy of the method is validated against clinical dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This technique represents a useful reference to gauge the utility of novel 3D quantification methods applied to HR-pQCT in multi-center clinical studies and potentially negates the need for separate forearm DXA measurements. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporotic status is primarily assessed by measuring areal bone mineral density (aBMD) using 2D dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, this technique does not sufficiently explain bone strength and fracture risk. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has been introduced as a method to quantify 3D bone microstructure and biomechanics. In this study, an automated method is proposed to simulate aBMD measures from HR-pQCT distal radius images. METHODS: A total of 117 subject scans were retrospectively analyzed from two clinical bone quality studies. The distal radius was imaged by HR-pQCT and DXA on one of two devices (Hologic or Lunar). Areal BMD was calculated by simulation from HR-pQCT images (aBMD(sim)) and by standard DXA analysis (aBMD(dxa)). RESULTS: The reproducibility of the simulation technique was 1.1% (root mean-squared coefficient of variation). HR-pQCT-based aBMD(sim) correlated strongly to aBMD(dxa) (Hologic: R (2) = 0.82, Lunar: R (2) = 0.87), though aBMD(sim) underestimated aBMD(dxa) for both DXA devices (p < 0.0001). Finally, aBMD(sim) predicted aBMD at the proximal femur and lumbar spine with equal power compared to aBMD(dxa). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that aBMD can be simulated from HR-pQCT images of the distal radius. This approach has the potential to serve as a surrogate forearm aBMD measure for clinical HR-pQCT studies when axial bone mineral density values are not required.
SUMMARY: An automated image processing method is presented for simulating areal bone mineral density measures using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in the ultra-distal radius. The accuracy of the method is validated against clinical dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This technique represents a useful reference to gauge the utility of novel 3D quantification methods applied to HR-pQCT in multi-center clinical studies and potentially negates the need for separate forearm DXA measurements. INTRODUCTION:Osteoporotic status is primarily assessed by measuring areal bone mineral density (aBMD) using 2D dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, this technique does not sufficiently explain bone strength and fracture risk. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has been introduced as a method to quantify 3D bone microstructure and biomechanics. In this study, an automated method is proposed to simulate aBMD measures from HR-pQCT distal radius images. METHODS: A total of 117 subject scans were retrospectively analyzed from two clinical bone quality studies. The distal radius was imaged by HR-pQCT and DXA on one of two devices (Hologic or Lunar). Areal BMD was calculated by simulation from HR-pQCT images (aBMD(sim)) and by standard DXA analysis (aBMD(dxa)). RESULTS: The reproducibility of the simulation technique was 1.1% (root mean-squared coefficient of variation). HR-pQCT-based aBMD(sim) correlated strongly to aBMD(dxa) (Hologic: R (2) = 0.82, Lunar: R (2) = 0.87), though aBMD(sim) underestimated aBMD(dxa) for both DXA devices (p < 0.0001). Finally, aBMD(sim) predicted aBMD at the proximal femur and lumbar spine with equal power compared to aBMD(dxa). CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that aBMD can be simulated from HR-pQCT images of the distal radius. This approach has the potential to serve as a surrogate forearm aBMD measure for clinical HR-pQCT studies when axial bone mineral density values are not required.
Authors: Galateia J Kazakia; Benedict Hyun; Andrew J Burghardt; Roland Krug; David C Newitt; Anne E de Papp; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T J Beck; T L Oreskovic; K L Stone; C B Ruff; K Ensrud; M C Nevitt; H K Genant; S R Cummings Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Stephanie Boutroy; Bert Van Rietbergen; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Francoise Munoz; Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Pascale Chavassieux; Morten Asser Karsdal; Toni Segovia-Silvestre; Anita V Neutzsky-Wulff; Roland Chapurlat; Georges Boivin; Pierre D Delmas Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-02