Literature DB >> 1431742

Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

C L Folk1, R W Remington, J C Johnston.   

Abstract

Four experiments tested a new hypothesis that involuntary attention shifts are contingent on the relationship between the properties of the eliciting event and the properties required for task performance. In a variant of the spatial cuing paradigm, the relation between cue property and the property useful in locating the target was systematically manipulated. In Experiment 1, invalid abrupt-onset precues produced costs for targets characterized by an abrupt onset but not for targets characterized by a discontinuity in color. In Experiment 2, invalid color precues produced greater costs for color targets than for abrupt-onset targets. Experiment 3 provided converging evidence for this pattern. Experiment 4 investigated the boundary conditions and time course for attention shifts elicited by color discontinuities. The results of these experiments suggest that attention capture is contingent on attentional control settings induced by task demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1431742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  479 in total

1.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.

Authors:  J Pratt; J Hillis; J M Gold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

Authors:  H Pashler; C R Harris
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Pinning down response inhibition in the brain--conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  C N Boehler; L G Appelbaum; R M Krebs; J M Hopf; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?

Authors:  Dominique Lamy; Yehoshua Tsal; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

5.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

6.  A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.

Authors:  D Lamy; Y Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

7.  Perceptual latency priming by masked and unmasked stimuli: evidence for an attentional interpretation.

Authors:  Ingrid Scharlau; Odmar Neumann
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-02-25

8.  Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Erik M Altmann; Thomas H Carr
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

Review 9.  CNTRICS final task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Steven J Luck; Cindy Lustig; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.