Literature DB >> 14620356

Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?

Dominique Lamy1, Yehoshua Tsal, Howard E Egeth.   

Abstract

Kim and Cave (1999) used spatial probes in order to measure the effects of bottom-up and top-down factors on the allocation of spatial attention over time. Subjects searched for a target with a unique shape, with a uniquely colored distractor present on each trial. The singleton distractor captured attention early in processing, whereas attention homed in on the target's location later on. Kim and Cave (1999) concluded that top-down factors cannot prevent the presence of a salient distractor from delaying target selection. The present study tested the idea that such results were obtained only because subjects adopted the strategy of searching for the most salient item. Kim and Cave's (1999) finding was replicated in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, instead of a feature search, subjects performed a conjunction search-that is, a task that could not be performed using a salience-based strategy. Probe response times were longest at the salient distractor's location at both the short and the long stimulus onset asynchronies. These results suggest that, early in processing, top-down factors can exert their influence and prevent the capture of attention by a salient distractor.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620356     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  22 in total

1.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  S Yantis; H E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.

Authors:  D Lamy; Y Tsal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

3.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: the effect of visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

4.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  R W Remington; J C Johnston; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

5.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

6.  Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; R Burger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

8.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  W F Bacon; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

9.  Attentional misguidance in visual search.

Authors:  S Todd; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

10.  Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.

Authors:  M Turatto; G Galfano
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  LIP responses to a popout stimulus are reduced if it is overtly ignored.

Authors:  Anna E Ipata; Angela L Gee; Jacqueline Gottlieb; James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

3.  Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09-29

4.  Transient Distraction and Attentional Control during a Sustained Selective Attention Task.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The attentional effects of single cues and color singletons on visual sensitivity.

Authors:  Alex L White; Rasmus Lunau; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Primate cognition: attention, episodic memory, prospective memory, self-control, and metacognition as examples of cognitive control in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Charles R Menzel; Audrey E Parrish; Bonnie M Perdue; Ken Sayers; J David Smith; David A Washburn
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-10

7.  Methylphenidate alters selective attention by amplifying salience.

Authors:  Niels ter Huurne; Sean James Fallon; Martine van Schouwenburg; Marieke van der Schaaf; Jan Buitelaar; Ole Jensen; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Feature singletons attract spatial attention independently of feature priming.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Alex L White; Wanghaoming Fang; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of attentional guidance during inefficient visual search.

Authors:  Alexandre Zenon; Suliann Ben Hamed; Jean-René Duhamel; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.