Literature DB >> 12956242

Tasks of a feather flock together: similarity effects in task switching.

Catherine M Arrington1, Erik M Altmann, Thomas H Carr.   

Abstract

Recent research on task switching has paid little attention to how tasks are represented and how the relations between task representations might affect the executive processes engaged to achieve a task switch. Two experiments investigated the effect of task similarity on task switching. Similarity was defined in terms of shared component operations--attentional control settings in Experiment 1 and response modality in Experiment 2--with tasks sharing more component operations said to be more similar to each other than tasks sharing fewer component operations. Across both experiments, task similarity facilitated task switching, seen in reduced switch costs for switching between similar tasks as opposed to dissimilar tasks. These results indicate that task similarity defined in terms of component operations can be used to define a multidimensional task space in which the executive processes of task selection and implementation are active.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12956242     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.

Authors:  M H Sohn; R A Carlson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory.

Authors:  G D Logan; M D Schulkind
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.

Authors:  Katherine D Arbuthnott; Todd S Woodward
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2002-03

4.  Task-set reconfiguration with binary and three-valued task dimensions.

Authors:  T Kleinsorge; H Heuer; V Schmidtke
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2001

5.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

6.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Limitations in advance task preparation: switching the relevant stimulus dimension in speeded same-different comparisons.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Hadas Marciano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

8.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 9.  Attention control: explorations of the work of an executive controller.

Authors:  D Gopher
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-12

10.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.

Authors:  P Sudevan; D A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  12 in total

1.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

2.  Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

3.  Testing the semantic differential as a model of task processes with the implicit association test.

Authors:  Maggie J Xiong; Gordon D Logan; Jeffery J Franks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-10

4.  Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: not so different after all.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Working memory capacity modulates task performance but has little influence on task choice.

Authors:  Karin M Butler; Catherine M Arrington; Christina Weywadt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

6.  Language-switch Costs from Comprehension to Production Might Just Be Task-switch Costs.

Authors:  Chuchu Li; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2021-12-01

7.  Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.

Authors:  Paul D Kieffaber; John K Kruschke; Raymond Y Cho; Philip M Walker; William P Hetrick
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Rethinking volitional control over task choice in multitask environments: use of a stimulus set selection strategy in voluntary task switching.

Authors:  Catherine M Arrington; Starla M Weaver
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The role of response modalities in cognitive task representations.

Authors:  Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-07-20

10.  What are task-sets: a single, integrated representation or a collection of multiple control representations?

Authors:  Dragan Rangelov; Thomas Töllner; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.