Literature DB >> 11848595

Spontaneous allocation of visual attention: dominant role of uniqueness.

H Pashler1, C R Harris.   

Abstract

Common sense suggests that unique or abruptly changing (transient) elements in a visual scene often draw attention involuntarily. Visual search studies paint a seemingly different picture, however Unique items usually draw attention involuntarily only when observers seek a unique target. One type of transient--abrupt onsets--draws attention involuntarily, but only when the observer is seeking an onset (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). One way of reconciling common-sense with these findings is to suppose that when people view a scene with no specific goal or task, they adopt a default set, which might prioritize novelty and/or transients. In two experiments, 336 subjects saw a single display of six items for 900 msec, expecting to have to describe it (Experiment 1) or make an aesthetic judgment about it (Experiment 2). One item in the display was either uniquely flashing (surrounded by static items) or uniquely static (surrounded by flashing items). In both studies, the unique item, even if static, was more often reported than the non-unique item, with flashing items enjoying an additional advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11848595     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  17 in total

1.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  S Yantis; H E Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Time course of attention effects with abrupt-onset and offset single- and multiple-element precues.

Authors:  G Chastain; M Cheal
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1999

3.  Color coding in a visual search task.

Authors:  B F GREEN; L K ANDERSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-01

4.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  R W Remington; J C Johnston; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

5.  Goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in cross-dimensional texture segregation.

Authors:  T G Ghirardelli; H E Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-07

6.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.

Authors:  B S Gibson; E M Kelsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-04

8.  Abrupt onsets do not aid visual search.

Authors:  E Kowler; G Sperling
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-10

9.  Attentional misguidance in visual search.

Authors:  S Todd; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-08

10.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Selection from perceptual and conceptual representations.

Authors:  Irene P Kan; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Color singleton pop-out does not always poop out: an alternative to visual search.

Authors:  William Prinzmetal; Nadia Taylor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

Review 3.  The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gaurav Patel; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Studying visual search using systems factorial methodology with target-distractor similarity as the factor.

Authors:  Mario Fifić; James T Townsend; Ami Eidels
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

5.  Deciding where to attend: priming of pop-out drives target selection.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Randolph Blake; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Is gaze following purely reflexive or goal-directed instead? Revisiting the automaticity of orienting attention by gaze cues.

Authors:  Paola Ricciardelli; Samuele Carcagno; Giuseppe Vallar; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differential activation of frontoparietal attention networks by social and symbolic spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Lauri Nummenmaa; Nikolaas N Oosterhof; Richard N Henson; James V Haxby; Andrew J Calder
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.436

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.